I've got odd priorities for sure! Like occasionally winning on defense; I've built a wall around my city of alternating Watchfires/Ritual Flames, Tactician's Towers and Sentinel Outposts (I don't ignore offensive army boosts at least). I also have every GB built in my main (now only) city including the bad ones because I want to have them all! I'm also in SAAB about to jump up to SAV. Game's about having fun and these things are fun for meThey are probably complete losers. Unless you're in the IA. Or your city is built up with lvl 2 ritual flames. Then I would like to ask, what do you play in this game? except for the green finger in the event history
The good thing about FOE is everyone can find their own game here. Do you like the green finger in the event history? Yes, you can play like this. Sit in the same age for many years. Attack everyone in a row in the hope of someone retaliating. Build ritual flames. Why not? But the devs have convinced us more than once that FOE is a team game. And they even made some gameplay for it. Team play does not involve building a city defense. This is not involved in any way at all. It's one thing when you personally mine and build signal / ritual flames. Another thing is when everyone, without exception, was not given a choice. Either eat what you don't need, or go without a prize. It's... It's not fair to the playersI've got odd priorities for sure! Like occasionally winning on defense; I've built a wall around my city of alternating Watchfires/Ritual Flames, Tactician's Towers and Sentinel Outposts (I don't ignore offensive army boosts at least). I also have every GB built in my main (now only) city including the bad ones because I want to have them all! I'm also in SAAB about to jump up to SAV. Game's about having fun and these things are fun for me
There is disappointment in the Grand Prize because the bonus for the defense army is useless. Were the defense something real in the game, less people would be disappointed. I don't think we can discuss the Abbey without discussing how useful or useless its main bonus is.This is a feedback thread regarding an event.
You can share your disappointment in the kind of boost that the Grand Prize has.
But if you want to discuss why you think that a bonus for your defense army is useless, please make a thread in the designated part of the forum.
But why wouldn't we be able to discuss why we feel like what the bonuses offering on theThis is a feedback thread regarding an event.
You can share your disappointment in the kind of boost that the Grand Prize has.
But if you want to discuss why you think that a bonus for your defense army is useless, please make a thread in the designated part of the forum.
Please keep this thread limited to questions and feedback about the Soccer cup.
If you want to discuss the efficiency of attack and defence armies, please create a thread here.
Each time someboy wish to give a negative feedback here, there is this so called "community manager" that says this is not the place to do this comment.This is a feedback thread regarding an event.
You can share your disappointment in the kind of boost that the Grand Prize has.
But if you want to discuss why you think that a bonus for your defense army is useless, please make a thread in the designated part of the forum.
Have you even read, what you quoted? Where do you read, that @lordwasa wrote, that they don't want negative feedback? He just wrote, that if we want to discuss the usefulness of city defense in general, we have to do it somewhere else. You can still write, that you don't like, that the building gives bonuses for the city defense or any other negative feedback.Each time someboy wish to give a negative feedback there is this so called "community manager" that says this is not the place to do this comment.
I am totally fed up wih the reaction of this gentleman. Let the member of this COMMUNITY express what they feel instead of reinstoring Gestapo into this forum.
I say that because we if we discuss of the adequacy of city defense in general here, we will have not such a comment !Have you even read, what you quoted? Where do you read, that @lordwasa wrote, that they don't want negative feedback? He just wrote, that if we want to discuss the usefulness of city defense in general, we have to do it somewhere else. You can still write, that you don't like, that the building gives bonuses for the city defense or any other negative feedback.
No. The game is currently built so that all the necessary resources are unprofitable (and uninteresting) to grow in the city. FP are useful. Supplies are useful. Even medals are useful. But it is easier to take it not from buildings, but by investing in GB, using the chateau or fighting. Mostly fighting. What we need for the fights? That's right, we need an attack bonus, units, and maybe goods to the treasury. It wasn't the players who made it up. The players just use it. And they want the developers to be consistent. Let them come up with points why we should want to build a defense of the city. Then there will be no negative feedback about the only (no choice) main prize that gives it. We will all desire for the bakery and this abbey.In a nutshell, the only feedback that the devs should take into consideration is that every building and GB added to the game from now on should provide both FP and offensive military bonuses. If it doesn't do both (or worse, neither) then it's 'useless'. Don't even bother putting anything besides these two bonuses on buildings anymore. Players on the forum only care about these two things.
As @Julian24 said correctly, we do not silence you.I say that because we if we discuss of the adequacy of city defense in general here, we will have not such a comment !
Let the people say what they wish to say :
This building event is totally useless [full point]
At the same time, without criticizing yourself, is this feedback still useful?I cannot effectively forward your feedback which would be the real shame.