qaccy
Emperor
@Lady Bulgar
I assume the worst of people because that's often what they present when complaining about something here. I was just filling in the blanks that you left behind based on past experience reading the posts of others not just in this thread, and not just of yourself, but in various feedback threads over the past several years. People generally try to overvalue themselves when pushing to get as much as possible for as little as possible.
To me, even suggesting that one be able to obtain set items from something as simple and effortless as watching ads, especially with no further explanation given, is just as 'outlandish' as what you claimed my post to be. Even over the course of a long period of time, watching ads still is not a difficult task, but as long as we agree that this feature should in no way be handing out high-value prizes left and right, the rate of acquisition, should this suggestion be adopted, can be left up to the devs.
I assume the worst of people because that's often what they present when complaining about something here. I was just filling in the blanks that you left behind based on past experience reading the posts of others not just in this thread, and not just of yourself, but in various feedback threads over the past several years. People generally try to overvalue themselves when pushing to get as much as possible for as little as possible.
To me, even suggesting that one be able to obtain set items from something as simple and effortless as watching ads, especially with no further explanation given, is just as 'outlandish' as what you claimed my post to be. Even over the course of a long period of time, watching ads still is not a difficult task, but as long as we agree that this feature should in no way be handing out high-value prizes left and right, the rate of acquisition, should this suggestion be adopted, can be left up to the devs.