an inhabitant of carcosa
Marquis
wat.jpgthe buildings should become cheaper
a guild that only has one sector needs much less buildings than a guild with 10 sectors
wat.jpgthe buildings should become cheaper
a guild that only has one sector needs much less buildings than a guild with 10 sectors
the huge problem with battleground is for example you put in the same season in gold category guild that they have 70 members and guild that they have 20 is this fair?????realy can anybody answer to me if this is fair .
ITS A HUGEEEE problem and inno must do something
but friend this isnt equalYes, it is fair. The 70 member guild will go to the next, or the 20 member guild will drop, or the 20 members are as good as the 70 and they stay together.
you are absolutely rightbut friend this isnt equal
the 20 member guild will have for example 1000 battles per day and the guild of 70 will have 3500 battles per day
but friend this isnt equal
the 20 member guild will have for example 1000 battles per day and the guild of 70 will have 3500 battles per day
they don't want that rightThat 20-member guild earned the right to fight against tougher guilds by beating weaker competition.
they don't want that right
they want to fight against other 20 men guilds
exactly
the fair it will be like inno does with guild expedition !!they dont put together the guild with 70 members with the guild with 20 members ,its totaly unfair
If you expect to only fight against bad opponents, but you want good rewards, than you shouldn't play any game I think...
Exactly right. In GE, a guild can take 1st week after week. In Battlegrounds, that isn't possible (except for the top guild). In Battlegrounds, a guild that does well will face tougher competition - and will eventually face competition that is too strong.Guild battlegrounds and guild expeditions are 2 total different parts of the game, for total different types of guilds...
You've gotten several answers. Why do you keep on about it?can anybody answer to me if this is fair
Not a fan, my input is that gbg should be a competition to determine who are the best OVERALL guilds. This change would also lead to no active guild letting in new players without a 80+ Arc thus creating an even greater gap in the game between new and old players (currently, gbg encourages recruitment).I SUGGESTincreasing the cost (in resources) of the province building to put in the guild battlefield sectors, depending on the number of sectors the guild has. The more sectors you own a guild, the more expensive it is to put buildings on your sectors.
Only then can there be a certain balance between the guilds..
Friendly said with the attriton change Inno backstabed all big players.
Or much better said they betrayed us.
They released with this update something that was not to be expect.
You've make rules so we could know what we should expect from this GG-Fights.
The massage was clear combind with the events
You need Attack and Goods and this in big style.
You tested the update and the beta too. And said ok its allright.
So players like me and my guildmembers know ok for us is it possible to overcome this 1750% Attack and Defense CAP at level 100.
Me maked preporations for attack etc.
We invested tenthousend of FPs to bring our CDM, Zeus, TA, Aachner near to level 100
Put Millions of Coins into the dealer.
Were ready to put about 125.000 Diamonds into the FB-Event for the 1x1 Building.
There are players who camp early era with troops several eras ahead... if Inno had left an attrition cap, these sort of players would make the game unbalanced...