lekond
Steward
maybe, I didn't think about it...
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
Feedback PvP Arena
- Thread starter Dudettas
- Start date
planetofthehumans2
Emperor
I tried the indy army with 0% and won, dang did not expect that. If you didn't post then I probably would have sat on my hands until I got kicked off the feature. Didn't want to lose all my units, but I lost half here.
But that's not to say, to the devs, that any of this is reasonable and that people more than one era up should NOT be in my list.
Fenix
Viceroy
And the reverse is: was for the first time attacked. Obviously I can't defend myself against a SAAB player (it is impossible, I am colonial).
This is what is terribly wrong with this thing. I get only 3 options, generally 2 are impossible, sometimes 3 are impossible. And apparently I appear as a target to high era players (it is impossible any kind of defence).
And if the players are being matched with the number of fights that shows that the person(s) involved in the development of this feature does not know nothing about the game.
This is what is terribly wrong with this thing. I get only 3 options, generally 2 are impossible, sometimes 3 are impossible. And apparently I appear as a target to high era players (it is impossible any kind of defence).
And if the players are being matched with the number of fights that shows that the person(s) involved in the development of this feature does not know nothing about the game.
Last edited:
Aether7
Farmer
They could keep the building and use it to access to the campaign map.
Thunderdome
Emperor
Majority of us aren't stupid. When you said feedback is gathered from other sources than just the forum, another place comes to mind which is the support part. Else, there could not be any other form since this is a beta test feature (and we're the beta players) and wasn't released in the live servers.
So, let's try again. Throw us a bone from Inno about the stuff that is being said on this, not of something that isn't even remotely suggested on this forum by anyone.
Aether7
Farmer
Easiest to implement would be to revert back to a previous version of the game before the PvP Arena existed.
Nessie
Baronet
FrejaSP
Viceroy
Yes losing army hurt for early ages, When you find room and goods for an Alca GB in your town, losing army won't hurt so much.
Just like with neighbor fights, some players do set up a good defense and do have several GB and buildings that increase their defense % and others don't care and have very low defense % and maybe only 2 useless spearfighters. Here they may choose a better army but if their Defense % are way lower than your Attack %, you may have a chance even vs higher timeages.
Remember both Attack (you attaking) and defense (City defense) do have have a % for attack and defense. You can se that in your main hall
Berenice la Sauvage
Squire
Last night, my colonial grenadiers were attacked by a Modern era player and a Future era player: curiously enough, they lost. 
But the point is that I was labelled as a "medium" opponent (I lost 100 points in every attack). How can a Colonial era player be the medium opponent for a Future era player? This matching system is more than flawed. As a low-era player, you can't win most fights and, if you climb a little in the ranking, you are smashed. There's no fun in that. With the towers' tournament, I could be a champion several times every week. Here, I'm just cannon-fodder for older players.
But the point is that I was labelled as a "medium" opponent (I lost 100 points in every attack). How can a Colonial era player be the medium opponent for a Future era player? This matching system is more than flawed. As a low-era player, you can't win most fights and, if you climb a little in the ranking, you are smashed. There's no fun in that. With the towers' tournament, I could be a champion several times every week. Here, I'm just cannon-fodder for older players.
Berenice la Sauvage
Squire
@bromtor : I think they listen. When @Dudettas says they don't have only the forum as feedback, I think it simply means they look at the data: how many diamonds were spent and bought by the players, how many players do participate, how many fights have been fought, and so on.
For example, the first change can mean two things: players have spent a lot of diamonds in the Arena so Inno wants them to keep spending or, in the contrary, players don't spend diamonds in the Arena and Inno hopes to increase the spending by letting players buy their ranking.
I do really hope other bigger changes will be done but I understand why nothing significant was done the first week. Revamping the matching system isn't easy and you have to reset the tournament.
For example, the first change can mean two things: players have spent a lot of diamonds in the Arena so Inno wants them to keep spending or, in the contrary, players don't spend diamonds in the Arena and Inno hopes to increase the spending by letting players buy their ranking.
I do really hope other bigger changes will be done but I understand why nothing significant was done the first week. Revamping the matching system isn't easy and you have to reset the tournament.
planetofthehumans2
Emperor
Don't assume that I'm in LMA here and not in SAA on live. I get my defenses kicked with hoovers two times yesturday, but my argument is still valid ESPECIALLY for younger age people. I'm in the bottom 1000 with easy/medium battles won and only one time I lost agaisnt LMA defense of 600% and one time my army was defeated by someone else. No possible way of getting a higher rank without high age units and 800%+ attack power to go against difficult opponents. In the most ideal circumstances, I'm still ranked 1000?? Do you not see how pitting a level 1 barbarian against a level 80 mage on the SIGNIFICANTLY small chances that the mage rolls a 1 on the attack might be considered unfair to most?
