DeletedUser4446
Guest
Yes, and yes.
Placed Atomium in city: 3743178
Leveled Atomium (to level 1): 3744078
Wouldn't this be 9 points per FP? That's a 900 point gain from a 100 FP expenditure. Where are people coming up with 15 points per FP?
Edit: nvm... I'm thinking of level 1 to 2
New question... do your FPs count for more points on high level GBs? I can imagine that an iron age player with a level 10 Zeus/Babel would be significantly ahead in ranking compared to his neighbors who have low levels on these GBs. Specifically, this player would have 75,000 points more than if he didn't own these GBs. While that isn't a lot in later ages, that's massive early on.
Am I supposed to get points from Goods collected by the Dynamic Tower during AIDing? I had 15 bonuses and scored 0 points.
If you trade 1FE good @21pts down at the FOE calculator rate you get 50 IA goodsJust donated 100 of one good in each age to see the points. It looks like each good is worth:
IA - 3
EMA - 3.5
HMA - 4
LMA - 4.5
CA - 5
InA - 5.5
PE - 6
ME - 11.5 (6.5 + CA)
PME - 12.5 (7 + InA)
CE - 13.5 (7.5 + PE)
TE - 19.5 (8 + ME)
FE - 21 (8.5 + PME)
I hope you're not referring to me when you say Inno. Being someone how joined the forum in 2013, surely you should have known I was not a mod then and always do the same type of calculations then as well. Now being a bit more on-topic, I fail to see what calculations are wrong.
If you trade 1FE good @21pts down at the FOE calculator rate you get 50 IA goods
50 IA goods @3pts/each = 150pts
Forget about making paper. Just trade down and fill your treasury with IA goods
I feel like the higher-age goods should be worth a bit more than they currently are, but all in all it seems fine. I don't think it's feasible to trade thousands of paper to iron age goods. Overall, I think the three biggest changes the new ranking system will have are:
1. People will be more reluctant to trade goods upwards at old trade ratios.
2. More people will ghost on GvG since that's the #1 way to collect points.
3. People will stop buying the new premium houses/production buildings since the increased production has no impact on ranking.
Aren't premium houses/production buildings worth more points though than non-premium?
That makes me much more relieved Sorry if I sounded a bit offensive. And yes, I also believe that the points are too close together.Hi Byeordie. I certainly don't mean you - and I didn't mean that a mathematical mistake had been made. What I mean is that the points value of goods donated is unbalanced. Many players will just build paper mills because the points return per square is better than that from higher age goods buildings if roads/happiness etc is taken into account.
I should have made it clearer. Sorry.
If I were to take a wild guess, I'd say that I've gathered somewhere in the ballpark of 1 billion coins and 300 million supplies over time, in my main city.
1,300,000,000 / 300 = 4,333,333 points lost to the new ranking
And to compensate me I get a piddly boost to my score from goods spent (maybe 1-2M) and a 640,000 point statue.
This ranking update is going to trash my total score (currently at 6.6M). If I'm lucky I'll lose 1/3 of my points.