ShadowPhoenixx95
Squire
Are the new buildings going to activate in this new guild raids features, IE the Tower of Champions, Tourney grounds and Forgotten Temple?
Thx
Wdym, none of them does anything GvG related currently.
Are the new buildings going to activate in this new guild raids features, IE the Tower of Champions, Tourney grounds and Forgotten Temple?
Thx
No, not more fighting bonuses! We've got enough of them already!What will happen to the Observatory?
Give us bonuses for units, please. We are really short of units!
If its a war on Cheaters Battlegrounds will be shut down tooInstead of closing the cheaters, Inno closed its feature. The only good feature it had.
Great attitude, let's declare defeat in the war against cheating.
This decision is Inno's way of saying "cheating is allowed here, there's nothing we can or are willing to do against it"
I actually didn't expect inno to sink THIS LOW. Disgusted.
I really hope not. If the rankings are frozen, then the you shouldn't get the goods back. Otherwise, everyone will use up their entire treasury placing sieges on the last day, and the rankings won't accurately reflect the status of the guilds.Good morning
a question, will there be a restitution of the resources committed "guilds against guilds" by era
in the guild treasury??? .
It'd make some amount of sense to give back a "grant freedom" amount - which is only half the goods you spent on it. Otherwise you might have people having the opposite reaction and just trying to ditch their whole territory to reclaim the goods before they can't any longer.I really hope not. If the rankings are frozen, then the you shouldn't get the goods back. Otherwise, everyone will use up their entire treasury placing sieges on the last day, and the rankings won't accurately reflect the status of the guilds.
Honestly, I would prefer if the rankings were frozen on an unannounced day, and then the maps where slowly whited out over time, giving you back your goods. I feel like that would be an unpopular idea though...It'd make some amount of sense to give back a "grant freedom" amount - which is only half the goods you spent on it. Otherwise you might have people having the opposite reaction and just trying to ditch their whole territory to reclaim the goods before they can't any longer.
Pledging to give back the amount you'd get from granting freedom gives the most encouragement to hold til the end if you can for the sake of making the final standings mean something.
It’s been used already so what any pledge would do is basically giving the option of fighting for free for the last months. Or letting guilds that may not have touched their sectors for a long time, because it’s actually not a live feature anymore, have this ‘banked’ goods flow come back to them. If they want them back, they should release, like always.It'd make some amount of sense to give back a "grant freedom" amount - which is only half the goods you spent on it. Otherwise you might have people having the opposite reaction and just trying to ditch their whole territory to reclaim the goods before they can't any longer.
Pledging to give back the amount you'd get from granting freedom gives the most encouragement to hold til the end if you can for the sake of making the final standings mean something.
I’m not sure they do now, certainly not on my live world. The maps have been pretty much stagnant for several months already.the rankings won't accurately reflect the status of the guilds.
It's not for free. You always lose half the goods you spent at minimum (and the other half if anyone takes it from you) when you release. Basically it'd be like everyone released everything the day after rankings were frozen - and that seems fair for a feature about to be disabled.It’s been used already so what any pledge would do is basically giving the option of fighting for free for the last months. Or letting guilds that may not have touched their sectors for a long time, because it’s actually not a live feature anymore, have this ‘banked’ goods flow come back to them. If they want them back, they should release, like always.
Good morning
a question, will there be a restitution of the resources committed "guilds against guilds" by era
in the guild treasury???
sureGood morning
a question, will there be a restitution of the resources committed "guilds against guilds" by era
in the guild treasury??? .
the 2 solutions areGood morning
two solutions
1- be at the end, part of the resources are returned
2 - be released before the end to recover as many resources as possible to use elsewhere
There's ways to tell and yeah, proven. reported. Zero doneIs the cheating in GBG actually proven?
Then you must not be in a guild competitive enough to have folks pay a subscription to allow them to cheat.But concerning GBG I have never seen any cheating. People sometimes think a bot is attacking but in reality it's 20-30 highly motivated players who are online at the same time and who take over a sector extremely quickly.
THIS!!! Either a spinoff game or just a separate server where anyone can play - similar to Beta. I dunno call it gvg.forgeofempires.com like beta is zz.forge...FACT :
1) There are people who which to continue to play GvG as it is.
2) Inno knows how to operate several other games than FOE
3) Inno wish to withdraw GvG out of FOE
PROPOSTION :
CREATE a FOE GvG spin-off game (even a fee-based game), so that guys can continue to play GvG as it is and INNO gain more MONEY !!
Do these elusive and mysterious bots have a way of preventing a user from accumulating attrition? If not, then all that they accomplish now is getting the user to their max attrition sooner rather than later.There's ways to tell and yeah, proven. reported. Zero done
Then you must not be in a guild competitive enough to have folks pay a subscription to allow them to cheat.