Imperator Andreas
Squire
any news on when the grid expansion goes live? or if they rejected it and 3 dia expansions is everything we're getting?
any news on when the grid expansion goes live? or if they rejected it and 3 dia expansions is everything we're getting?
FoE is more than just a market, many of us play it because we like battles and challenges.
we already have galata tower and remember that the new GBuilding's name is AI Core, AI can do anything faster, can do anything automatically and the idea of do not require a road has more sense than what you have said.How about a minefield GB that give a % chance to Destroy people attacking your city and stealing your goods.
we already have galata tower and remember that the new GBuilding's name is AI Core, AI can do anything faster, can do anything automatically and the idea of do not require a road has more sense than what you have said.
Yes, but it already removes 50% of plundersGalata tower does no damage
I hope a new GB what gives critic chance for defense. like artic orangery. but in defense... Whit a chance to reduce damage 50% or something like that. That would be a very good GB in my opinion
71 to be exact....this is getting interesting. This is what I was looking for to know if Space Age Jupiter Moon is coming soon. We had 3 expansions left and when they announced it for the expanded castle system, I knew more expansions were coming! I didn't expect this many!!!There's like around 50 more expansions that have just been added to the city!!! Hmm. I wonder if the new GB will include expansions as a bonus. I know 3 for the new Castle System. Unless these are also included with the future eras!!! That means a lot of diamond spending if ever for the extras.....hmmm. More Terrace farms for me and maybe more Vineyards!!!
yeah and after get all the expansions you want filled up with your desired buildings what are you going to say? "I need more expansions" again? people who ask for more expansions simply just deserve have some of their expansions removed forever until they learn how to play with what they have. . .
While I’m not against the idea of introducing a building for defending army, like Zukerberg said, Arctic Orangery already works on Defense.I hope a new GB what gives critic chance for defense. like artic orangery. but in defense... Whit a chance to reduce damage 50% or something like that. That would be a very good GB in my opinion
It was my understanding that the suggestion was for an AO equivalent that affects the defense of the army, such as by having a chance to reduce the damage taken by 50%, to reuse the relevant example.While I’m not against the idea of introducing a building for defending army, like Zukerberg said, Arctic Orangery already works on Defense.
On time travel yes, on VF retrostyle I agreed that something like it holds some plausibility. Also on that there are more ways to paint an cat. Though silly enough that was either missed or ignored.We clearly have vastly different views on this and that's fine.
So, for the sake of attacking someone with the “the game shouldn’t be perfected for you’re play style argument” you much rather have yet another noob trap for a second year in a row then an GB that’s actually good? This age will beyond the looks and concept not bring much to look forward to. An exciting GB would however be beneficial for most.So basically the demand for the Great Buildings was there, you just decided you'd decide for everyone else how they should play the game.
What would you want the new GB to be then? Powercreep being what it is, even if it was a amazing ability it's still going to be expensive to level.
You’re also not really respecting the game or other players if you much rather see yet another lacklustre and bad GB for the sake for trash talking someone.You don't respect the game or the other players, and honestly, I don't know why you're still playing, if everything is as bad as you say...
You’re extremely bias now. First you’re trash talking someone who just wishes for an good GB, not perse for trade and are attacking that person for that wish to comply with their play style and now you’re acting like the battle play style is the ultimate play style. pretty bias don’t you think?many of us play it because we like battles and challenges. Not everything is based on GB.
but if it would be an AO equivalent then it would also work for attackingIt was my understanding that the suggestion was for an AO equivalent that affects the defense of the army, such as by having a chance to reduce the damage taken by 50%, to reuse the relevant example.