I will talk about my case only without sharing the other players, even if I know that I am not isolated.
My small guild consists of 20 members, including 15 fighters.
We play for fun, not to brag about being the best or even win huge amounts of rewards.
We refuse to merge so as not to lose our family spirit and our pleasure of playing together.
We have had these situations for two years:
- one in four GbG where we watch others having fun without being able to do much
- one out of four GbGs where we wait for other guilds to decide to take sectors
- and two out of four GbGs where we are facing fairly close guilds where we can finally have fun.
I'm not jealous of anyone, I just find it a shame that we can only have fun for 4 weeks every 2 months.
I would like my guild to stay in platinum, or even gold, but against guilds of the same abilities.
This nerf is not the right solution especially since according to MY analysis it is only intended to cap gains while restoring importance to attrition.
Nobody asked for this nerve but it should be noted that on Dunarsund, the medium and small guilds which find themselves with large guilds do not find themselves 24/7 faced with locks at the exit of their HQ.
So between only doing 30 fights per day (even if my city would allow me to do 3 times more) instead of the 0 before this nerf, it's still a step forward.
If the strong guilds had left the sectors in front of the HQ of the small guilds without blocking them, their checkerboard would have prevented tens, even hundreds of guilds from complaining, without questioning their superiority. I don't judge anyone, I only see the consequences of everyone's actions.
I'm not asking for nerfs against the stronger ones, nor help for the weaker ones, I just want more balance. And if Inno is not able to respond to my request, I would have found it normal for the big guilds to understand that their anti-game can only harm their earnings.
My small guild consists of 20 members, including 15 fighters.
We play for fun, not to brag about being the best or even win huge amounts of rewards.
We refuse to merge so as not to lose our family spirit and our pleasure of playing together.
We have had these situations for two years:
- one in four GbG where we watch others having fun without being able to do much
- one out of four GbGs where we wait for other guilds to decide to take sectors
- and two out of four GbGs where we are facing fairly close guilds where we can finally have fun.
I'm not jealous of anyone, I just find it a shame that we can only have fun for 4 weeks every 2 months.
I would like my guild to stay in platinum, or even gold, but against guilds of the same abilities.
This nerf is not the right solution especially since according to MY analysis it is only intended to cap gains while restoring importance to attrition.
Nobody asked for this nerve but it should be noted that on Dunarsund, the medium and small guilds which find themselves with large guilds do not find themselves 24/7 faced with locks at the exit of their HQ.
So between only doing 30 fights per day (even if my city would allow me to do 3 times more) instead of the 0 before this nerf, it's still a step forward.
If the strong guilds had left the sectors in front of the HQ of the small guilds without blocking them, their checkerboard would have prevented tens, even hundreds of guilds from complaining, without questioning their superiority. I don't judge anyone, I only see the consequences of everyone's actions.
I'm not asking for nerfs against the stronger ones, nor help for the weaker ones, I just want more balance. And if Inno is not able to respond to my request, I would have found it normal for the big guilds to understand that their anti-game can only harm their earnings.