its rude that you think so many players are stupid.
It's not a "misconception". I have examined the battle data of players in multiple guilds on several different servers/worlds. In every instance I observed the same thing. I don't find a "normal distribution" of battles, a bell-shaped curve where a few players get a lot of battles, a few get a small number, and the remainder get the majority of battles, Instead, the battle distribution is highly skewed, a few (+/- 15% of the members) get a disproportionately high amount of fights (+/- 80% of the total), a small number of members (+/- 15%) get a small number of fights (+/- 15% of the total), and the rest get few to none. Granted, your Guild may be an exception though I doubt it.its rude that you think so many players are stupid.
you claim that 70-75 players work in each top guild, and then 4-6 players collect everything.
But people can say anything to you, you have a misconception with which you want to convince everyone.
good luck for that.
It is you who take us for fools.
Thanks for sharing data that is consistent with what I have been observing. The bottom 25% of members account for only 2.4% of the fights. Now, send us the stats on the top 25% of the members to see if they account for 80+% of the fights as has been observed elsewhere.
can't show the impossible. if half of the top guild reaches 5000 battles, the other half has nothing left. By the way, there are few players with lot of battles in the guilds, because few people take on night games. However 40% of battles in a season take place at night and dawn. During the day 70 players share the battles, at night it is good if 4-5. I dont judge either side, if someone wants to play at night, then play, if want to sleep, then sleep. So it is pointless to expect statistics where even half of the guilds have the same number of battles, each person has a different time schedule, free time, and priorities in life.
Your argument doesn't consider the effect of time zones and presumes that nearly everyone sleeps at the same time (e.g. 10PM-6AM). Even so, using your example, 70 players (87%) share access to 60% of the battles. If this is true, then there should be a bell-shaped distribution of these battles. In your guild then, 4-5 players would have an understandable large number of battles (these players are outliers) but everyone else's battles should follow a normal distribution. I've never seen an example of this but, will gladly stop supporting the nerf if you can show me that this is the case in your live server guild.
It's a game. No one owes you anything here. Guilds play the way they can and the way they want. Each player has individual opportunities and interests. Nevertheless, to assume that the players, as slaves, as dumb creatures, tolerate dictatorship and violence in the game is an extreme degree of insanity. How can you force someone to hit against their will, or not let them hit? where did come from such wild and strange fantasies?
I never said that we need to "make everyone hit the same way". I'm challenging your claim (and that of @HunZ95) that the fights are not primarily going to a very few members of your guild while the majority get iced out for any number of reasons. "This one is sick", "that one has poor eyesight", "the other one is lazy" is just rationalization and does not explain what simple examination reveals. In every guild that I have examined very few players account for most of the battles. Thus far, you will not, or cannot, offer data to the contrary. Elimination of zero attrition will go a long way towards levelling the field within each guild and provide better opportunity to the lesser players.
Yes. Of course. Elimination zero attrition will heal everyone at once.
And by lesser players you mean the ones that dont want to take the time to be on when they should and could care less about getting a bunch of fights those ones? Makes no sense, sounds like the guy that says i dont want to work and why should i when the gov will give me a welfare check then turn around and complain that they guy that does work a lot has more money than him and wants to limit that mans work so he is poor as well. The lets all have less together mentality.
Why should we be healed ? we are not sick, Elemination of zero attrition will heal the abuse and greed of some whales that's all.Yes. Of course. Elimination zero attrition will heal everyone at once.
If it heal you, it will be FOE's greatest achievement.
Well the same applies to you , constantly whining because inno brings in the "nerf"
You keep putting words into my mouth. By "lesser" players I mean the ones that are not getting an opportunity to earn a fair share of the GBG battles. Your generalization is that all players getting only a small number of battles do so by choice while you refuse to accept that there are players that want to fight more but the whales ice them out. If you are right, and I do not think that you are, why does your guild permit so many slackers to remain on board?