no it is not false. It is normal. You have award for winning - so you need ranking. Its just to organize everything. show chances, loses, wins etc.
In new GB there are 2 purposes
1. win in diamond - to get new building
2. win championship.
Nothing more really matters. You cant make a ranking that will shot strenght of guild becasue every session is different and depends on other factors - enemies.
You can only show the strongest guild proprly - only if you gurantee that the guild with the same amount of wins will play togheter in last season.
If so, the ranking would perfectly show the strongest guild, cuz those guild would won with second and probably with the third guild.
This Gbg format has 1 award, and that is per season. Then there is winning the championship. That carries no extra prize. What it does carry is bragging rights and a ‘1’ in the last column, no additional ranking for that. *But* soon this is the only ranking the majority of players will see, and around mid December, it will be the only ranking, at least for now. Of course it matters, why else would people have paid any attention to their Gvg based ranking? Or to anyone else’s? Maybe it’s world dependent how much attention was ever paid to that, but my world has had a fair few guilds who did.
Back to prizes - again, how is it ok that you fight and end up 2nd 6 times in 1000 lps league, and don’t even get the level 1 building? When fighting baby dime and winning there only 3 times, something that takes way less effort and will be reality for a few guilds, unless they completely mess up their dropping down in the points, gives you the first level?
I do think there needs to be an adjustment and weighting also of how many battles are done, the league/tier point bracket in which a win and league points were obtained, and potentially also an extra something that you carry with you if you win a championship, be it an extra 100 lps or whatever.