Guild Battleground

[esoterism]

We need a new reallocation of Guild by League so that not all the top guild get systematically allocation to the same guild and the top one always win and the weakest always loose. A system like in Tennis could be adopted with consist of determining head of series, so that we get allocation like
- 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25
- 2, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26
- 3, 7, 12, 17, 22, 27
- 4, ,8 13, 18, 23, 28
- 9, 14, 19, 24, 29...
Instead of existing classification, it would allow to the weakest of the top to be able to play, which currently the aren't.

 

[beelzebob666]

Problem with this suggestion is, that the top 50 guilds all have 1000LP (although they have very different strengths) - how would you rank them to fit your scheme?

 

[CrashBoom]

can we have the version please where the 7 best guilds are in the same battlefield

we always get 2 top guilds which are swapping the sectors and small 1000 LP guilds have no chance

 

[Owl II]

can we have the version please where the 7 best guilds are in the same battlefield

we always get 2 top guilds which are swapping the sectors and small 1000 LP guilds have no chance

This was in the first 2-3 months. And it was hell

 

[esoterism]

Problem with this suggestion is, that the top 50 guilds all have 1000LP (although they have very different strengths) - how would you rank them to fit your scheme?

Release the 1000LP cap so that we know who is really at the top.

 

[beelzebob666]

Release the 1000LP cap so that we know who is really at the top.

That prevents newly established guilds to ever catch up to the established ones.

The real solution is to redo the ranking system - but that is easier said than done.

 

[CrashBoom]

That prevents newly established guilds to ever catch up to the established ones.

and ?

does a newly started player ever catch up to the ones who started 8 years ago

 

[esoterism]

I do not exactly care how they allocate the guilds, but it should be done in a manner that allow all to play and not only the fat ones of each leagues. It could be also based on heavy penalties (increase of attrition) to larges ones defined on how many sectors they own on the map, so t that it at least get the large ones focused on the center allow the smaller one on Zone 3 and Zone 4.
Currently tey are session where one or an association of 2 guilds take it all and unable others to play.

 

[Owl II]

and ?

does a newly started player ever catch up to the ones who started 8 years ago

Yes

 

[The Lady Ann]

Release the 1000LP cap so that we know who is really at the top.

I did a detailed proposal for how to advance the guild ranking system as well as tweaking the whole GbG and it was no sooner posted than I was slapped down and told 'it's on the do not suggest list' it's not at least not in EN

 

[esoterism]

I did a detailed proposal for how to advance the guild ranking system as well as tweaking the whole GbG and it was no sooner posted than I was slapped down and told 'it's on the do not suggest list' it's not at least not in EN

This a MAJOR problem of CbG => the allocation of guild within Leagues has absolutely NO SENSE,
It privilege the few guilds at the top that then are more at the top, and unable other to play, progress and finally disappointed players either stop or goes to top guild which reinforce the hegemony.

THIS SHOULD BE AMENDED AND QUICKLY

 

[Owl II]

1) The major problem - no motivation for guilds. Only the players are motivated.
2) If the players are happy, no one will change anything.

 

[CrashBoom]

This a MAJOR problem of CbG => the allocation of guild within Leagues has absolutely NO SENSE,

yes because all have 1000

the basic concept of league generating is
the best 7 (or 8) face each other
then 8-14
15-21
and so on

but because all have 1000 the game can't take the best 7

 

[Emberguard]

but because all have 1000 the game can't take the best 7

Maybe if we had GBG trophies for winning in Diamond League (like how GE has trophies) the game could group 1000 LP leagues based on Trophy weighting

 

[esoterism]

Any perspective of getting INNO considering doing something about this, or are we there just to propose idea that goes directly into the bin ?

 

[Owl II]

If the feature is in demand, no reason to change it. GE championship is also imperfect. No one has taken care of it for years.

 

[esoterism]

Ok, then why let this "New Ideas" section opened, if nobody cares about what is written in there !!! PLEASE close this section, if this is so.

 

[CrashBoom]

if you get enough yes votes it gets forwarded

too bad you don't have a poll

 

[Emberguard]

Ok, then why let this "New Ideas" section opened, if nobody cares about what is written in there !!! PLEASE close this section, if this is so.

Let Inno decide on that one. GE was fairly recently updated with the Lvl 2 upgrades for various GE buildings. There’s been many things suggested by players through the years that have been implemented in more recent times

Just because you may not see change immediately doesn’t mean your proposal won’t have a impact further down the road.

 

[Emberguard]

if you get enough yes votes it gets forwarded

too bad you don't have a poll

And this, @esoterism you’ll need to add a poll. Should be a setting for it in the top right dropdown box above your post (I think)