@Prinza the Hunter The numbers actually indicate that the Oracle is better on both counts. It's rather odd for a 'Stone Age' GB (it's cheaper than Bronze, so this is what I'm calling it) to outperform a GB numerically that's 4 ages above it. While it's more likely for this to mean that the Oracle will be toned down, it would be nice if the nerf bat swung upwards instead in this instance, because here are happiness values of other GBs at level 10, in ascending order of FP cost:
1. Oracle 1700 3x3 - 189/sq
2. Colosseum 4000 6x7 - 95/sq
3. Hagia 6400 7x6 - 152/sq
4. Notre Dame 3900 4x6 - 163/sq
5. Dresden 4900 5x5 - 196/sq
6. Alcatraz 11300 10x7 - 161/sq
7. Space Needle 4800 6x5 - 160/sq
8. Atomium 9700 7x6 - 231/sq
9. Lotus 10000 6x6 - 278/sq
10. Gaea 12300 6x4 - 513/sq
Going purely by age, you can see that it does generally go up as you move down the list (and up in age). Dresden is perhaps a bit high, Alcatraz and Space Needle are a touch too low, and Gaea completely blows everything else away. The Needle would probably be slightly worse than Atomium regardless and possibly even Alcatraz, since larger buildings tend to have more value per square to compensate for taking up more space and being harder to place, which in this case would probably overcome the age difference (Alcatraz is over 2x the size of the Needle). However, the given happiness value for the Oracle would place it firmly around the Colonial age if not higher, which is very odd for a supposed 'first' GB. It's certainly extremely powerful especially considering a new player will basically have it handed to them. There will be some deviation of course, but it can be assumed that even at level 1, this GB's going to be better than a lot of the above listed, especially with no need to hunt BPs and no goods cost. If any rebalancing is done, it's very likely this GB will see a reduction in capability but it's also pretty likely that it won't be touched since they're both fairly low-impact bonuses.