Heya
. Fast aiding was never an intentional change. It was a side effect of a bug which resulted in the possibility to execute an action without the previous one being completed. This is of course not ideal and also resulted in tons of "can not polish" error messages being displayed, which - I am sure - everyone saw at least a few times
.
If we ever go for a "fast aiding" improvement, it will be done properly
.
Yeah, figured as much since the clicks went through the protective layer. So, this was unintentional and allowed us to start drinking before the drink has been poured? Certainly not. Sure, there are programs that require by design for one task to be finished to start a new one, most are on floppy disks in dusty boxes in cellars or on attics, some run on factory line conrolling computers 286-line or similar.
Now, in today's electronic world, it is normal, easy AND, in fact, quite ideal to be able to start several tasks at once which, ideally, are then finished orderly and properly -- if the programming was done the same way.
I knew all along -- and now does everyone else for a fact -- that nothing *in principle* prevents us from unloading mo-po-clicks as fast as humanly possible.
I hope for the sakes of the karma of the people responsible that the delay is only installed to cover some really bad programming ...but I doubt it. Come on, people, 1000ms is *really* pushing it, what do you let the script do, parse through every click we've ever done?! This is an ETERNITY in today's lighting fast computing world. Forget "fast [lol] aiding improvement", how about mitigating insanely slow aiding due to grossly exaggerated impediment?
I may have seen some error messages -- but I am also keenly aware that displayed error messages do not equal real errors. Such messages may or may not be an indication for the occurrence of errors. Relatively certain, however, is we should think errors have occured.
Now, readers, I am not implying a lie. I have roughly disected or paraphrased parts of the above quoted message to raise awareness of its spin. I do not like to read through spun messages. Of course, everybody spins a little. But spin is poison to all scientific and technical issues.
I am not demanding a message like: "Hi. Oops. Somebody screwed up so you could do much more much faster than we want you to be able to. This sucks. Now you know and we hate you knowing it, did you see our messages, did you, did you? Well, don't hold your breath for us freely allowing you that stuff." -- and this is, of course, a comic exaggeration of what easily might be read into the above message -- but there has to be something in between... ^^