This would also be a good time to redesign a new version (FOE2) from the ground up, fixing balance issues that have cropped up (among other things), but I know that isn't going to happen either.
Would love to see something like that. I mean they already have the snowy designs from the winter-let us have skins for our cities surrounding terrains. It would be amazing change the appearance to winter, fall, spring designs in that terrain and mixing with different daytimes.
Forgetting for a moment that ideas about new GBs or simply new buildings are DNSL an idea for that should define in the Details section as a minimum:a new game breaker GBuilding which at level 80 gives you 40% of chance to receive a pack of 2 FPs in your inventort every 4 FPs spent.
Not a new idea.- allow players move their whole city + all their items in the inventory to an older world or to a another server.
no GB for GbGrounds please, GbGrounds is one of the biggest mistakes of FoE ever, it should be deleted and forgotten forver, GvG too, both are the worst system to make guild fights each other I've never seen in my life.
- Name of the GB: Lucky Hit
- Age of the GB: Jupiter
- Size: 5x7 ? 6x6 ? Other? 6x6
- Visual Design / Image: Casino
- Active Reward: Coins? Other? None? None
- Passive Reward: X% of chance to not increase their attrition level, only for the owner.
Create an army of "Giants" which are 10 times stronger than units of the same age, to dominate all fights unless the opponent have manage to setup a DA of 8 "Giants", and even in that scenario, the attacker have advantages against the AI? Highly unbalanced idea. Would the game also use "Giants" in the battles at Continent Map, GE, etc?Logically, technically and mentally felt like this idea to be taken under DNSL but it would be interesting addition to the game.
Why so. Have to think bit smarter than current way to do attack and defense. Everyone has to revisit their unit setup whenever required. It doesn't matter if user has Alcatraz or rogue hideout or governor villas or CDM, AO, TA gbs etc. 10000 units in army management, bored to do the battle same way all these years. Thought to have some different approach.Highly unbalanced idea.
We already have 10x stronger units than regular units. It simply requires 900% AT/DEF%. So, stacking units is simply an easy and cheap way for unlocking that bonus.
Exactly an cheap way to get up to 900% bonus for armies on top of whatever present GBs give. Just as well give us an cheap and easy way to give us an maxed out bonus of all GBs, in particular the Arc, 4x more rewards will be an interesting and "smarter" way of managing the Arc booster groups.But then you could also have 900% Atk/Def on your giant on top of that and it'd stack to 100x stronger units