• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can     REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.

Rejected GBG: prevent guilds being locked into the HQ forever

Status
Not open for further replies.
CrashBoom

CrashBoom

Legend
Reason
weak guilds shouldn't be locked in their HQ for the whole season from 2 dominating guilds
Details
see above
Balance
it is for all guilds. so I don't see something to balance here
Abuse Prevention
I don't see abuse. but maybe someone finds something ;-)
Summary
sectors next to HQ can only be attacked from a different guild if the home guild is owner
Have you looked to see if this has already been suggested?
not suggestest
in GBG sectors directly next to the HQ can only be attacked:
a) from the home guild if someone else owns it OR
b) IF that sector is owned by the home guild arleady then it can be conquered by a different guild
c) if it has no owner (at the beginning of the season).

if those sectors are owned by a different guild (not the home guild) no third guild can attack or conquer it
so 2 dominating guilds NEVER could lock a weak guild in their HQ totally because after the first guild has taken those sectors the other couldn't attack those sectors anymore
 
Upvote -8 Downvote
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
DEADP00L

DEADP00L

Emperor
Perk Creator
It should not be forgotten that the only worries of regroupings (therefore of balance of the present guilds) exist only in league 1.000 LP!
I sincerely think that if the groupings were made according to the number of LP BEFORE the guilds with more than 1,000 were reduced to 1,000, it would greatly reduce the effects of 2 large guilds assigned with 6 averages.
Why 8 guilds in 1,000 LP who each win their GbG are never grouped together in the following season?
And then I will be told that the GbG championship is only based on previous performances, which demonstrates that this is false.
 
Astrid

Astrid

Baronet
Like it or hate it, all the matching problems we have right now in guild battlegrounds are because you can battle with no attrition. Once the 66% cap will be finally deployed on live, things will start to automatically fix. Guilds with 1-3 members or with mostly inactive players have no place in Diamond League for example.
 

Emir von Katar

Steward
Wasn't it written some time ago that changing the % won't go live?
but this idea isn´t good for 1000 Point Diamond Liga
there must be possible to fight on every sektor
 
CrashBoom

CrashBoom

Legend
Emir von Katar said:
Wasn't it written some time ago that changing the % won't go live?
Click to expand...
not yet.
and before it goes live more changes will come

We share your feelings about GBG, so, among other plans, we would like to revisit GBG later this year to introduce more changes that will hopefully help us improve the feature. Because of this, we will keep the current balancing on beta and not yet release it on live markets. This way, we will not go back and forth with the changes and later can shape the whole feature to see how everything performs in a complex.
Click to expand...
 

Grzechu Junior

Baronet
CrashBoom said:
in GBG sectors directly next to the HQ can only be attacked:
a) from the home guild if someone else owns it OR
b) IF that sector is owned by the home guild arleady then it can be conquered by a different guild
c) if it has no owner (at the beginning of the season).

if those sectors are owned by a different guild (not the home guild) no third guild can attack or conquer it
so 2 dominating guilds NEVER could lock a weak guild in their HQ totally because after the first guild has taken those sectors the other couldn't attack those sectors anymore
Click to expand...
just start playing ffs.
You are to weak guild? yo uare not in the right level. Thats all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top