Feedback Cultural Settlements - Aztecs

[Migiwa]

Oh god ! I was so excited to start the new settlement as I was so disappointed by the Egyptian one (personnal feeling, I do know some found it cool)... And I find out that Inno placed one impediment per expansion...again... WHY?!

 

[Moctezuma I]

I love the Aztecs! Great idea! Thank you, Inno!

 

[Ian Santa Claus]

when Egyptians started there was a lot of negative feedback at the start with that about the cost of roads and the impediments, but after actually running through it a couple of times it proved to be the easiest to complete in the time allotted for the gold reward.
So I'll reserve judgement on what seems to be a high cost for expansions until I've done the whole thing at least once.

 

[Okamiris]

@Dudettas

The Sun Temple is a fantastic 3x4

or 4x3 ?

 

[-Alin-]

I still dont understand that minigame, it is minesweeper or so?
Sometimes happened to dissapear with one click half of that table )

I love the final prize anyway, and the look too of it.

 

[CrashBoom]

I still dont understand that minigame, it is minesweeper or so?

yes minesweeper

but in this game you should hit the mines

 

[MS.Mawoo]

Im in high early age so I cant test it

 

[Emberguard]

Not sure where in game description it says that so I would assume its only yours "meant".

Well Great Buildings in the main city were removed from working with Settlements (eg: Himeji, Space Carrier, Chateau Front) because the settlements are a separate entity from the main city.

I don't see any obstacles why not to connect it to one of the cultural settlements.

Who knows. Maybe a future settlement will go down a route like that. What's true today won't always be true tomorrow

so I don't see any barriers why not to add such bonus to new Aztec building.

No barriers per se. Just a thought on a potential alternative if they wanted to take a different route from boosting the ToR bonus directly.

yes minesweeper

but in this game you should hit the mines

Reverse mine sweeper

 

[kuxux40]

i would like to know if the x4 bonus production could run with to the mini- game instead of the boost ?

 

[Emberguard]

i would like to know if the x4 bonus production could run with to the mini- game instead of the boost ?

"Could" as in you want it to be added? Or "could" as in asking if it's already present?

From the announcement:

Please note that the luck bonus (x4) does not apply to this minigame.

 

[Berenice la Sauvage]

Taking into account that Aztecs are very close to Guild Expedition theme I would expect that we will earn settlement coins necessary to produce goods by completing expedition stages. That would be really awesome!

It would mean you couldn't do the settlement whithout belonging to a guild.

Yeah. That or if they don't want to boost the ToR then it could of been an entirely new Relic that only the settlement building drops.

I like this idea.

 

[kuxux40]

"Could" as in you want it to be added? Or "could" as in asking if it's already present?

From the announcement:

if it's already present....

 

[Emberguard]

if it's already present....

Great. Then no. No x4 in the Aztecs mini game

 

[D-Best]

They should give all of us the chance to test this new settlement on Beta and apply that interdiction on live servers... or I don't know.

 

[AGranolaBar]

They should give all of us the chance to test this new settlement on Beta and apply that interdiction on live servers... or I don't know.

If exceptions started to be made from regular play than it would disbalance the game. After all it works like a "normal" server and 30% defense in low ages is a gamechanger.

 

[Emberguard]

If exceptions started to be made from regular play than it would disbalance the game. After all it works like a "normal" server and 30% defense in low ages is a gamechanger.

Yeah good point. And somehow I don't think we'd be getting the ability on Beta to do the settlement and be locked out of using/receiving the prizes until we reach Colonial Age so we can test it unless it was then implemented that way in Live servers

 

[CrashBoom]

they could start a new world for testing this new settlement

all get a city in colonial age

and in a few month they close it

 

[D-Best]

If exceptions started to be made from regular play than it would disbalance the game. After all it works like a "normal" server and 30% defense in low ages is a gamechanger.

30% attack in low ages is a gamechanger too. I was thinking of more feedback, but maybe those who provide it are already "advanced" players. Moreover, everything seems to be ok, there were no problems with settlements over the time.

 

[The Great Tester]

It would mean you couldn't do the settlement whithout belonging to a guild.

You can easily create your own guild with one click . Don't see a problem here at all.

 

[The Great Tester]

If exceptions started to be made from regular play than it would disbalance the game. After all it works like a "normal" server and 30% defense in low ages is a gamechanger.

30% attack in low ages is a gamechanger too. I was thinking of more feedback, but maybe those who provide it are already "advanced" players. Moreover, everything seems to be ok, there were no problems with settlements over the time.

Can't agree with that because of three things:
1) Low ages units have low stats. Low stats * 30% = low advantage.
2) It will take at least 3-5 months to fully complete Vikings or Aztecs. During that time players can move far away from low ages and that bonus won't affect that much.
3) And if the person stays in low ages for that amount of time he could easily get other event buildings and level up his Zeus/Achen/CdM so 30% won't do that much.