Arch1e
Marquis
But then why should Inno give them back to you in the end. You want to keep playing but then be gifted them back?
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
Feedback Big news for Forge!
- Thread starter Juber
- Start date
I have evidence that (edit)part of(/edit) the first "this" appears to be under A/B testing. some of my (live) cities exhibit a behavior similar to that described in the post - kinda.
It's not random, but it's determined by the order I add my troops to my army which acts a lot like random when swapping troops unless I make effort to empty and reload armies in a particular order. But it only happens in some of my cities, not all I tested when someone complained about their troops being ordered wrong. Hence I believe it's under A/B test (or was - i haven't retested it in the last few weeks).
Edit: the thread where I was testing the behavior: https://forum.us.forgeofempires.com...battlefield-for-ai-defence.45520/#post-401893
Last edited:
CrashBoom
Legend
no
PilgrimDK
Merchant
If they steal currency from your group by removing an entity, is it not normal to replace what Will be lost. Why should some guilds not be compensated for the stuff they loose due to a revoke from devs side? They remove a part that is in use so why not just auto reverse whats in use as if They were released? That will give gvg players time to play it to the end
CrashBoom
Legend
then don't play til the end and just stop 5 minutes earlier and release the sectors 
maybe in GvG will be like when the German postal service (Deutsche Post) decided they end delivering telegrams end of 2022
on the last day there will be more action than in the whole year before
maybe in GvG will be like when the German postal service (Deutsche Post) decided they end delivering telegrams end of 2022
on the last day there will be more action than in the whole year before
ShadowPhoenixx95
Squire
Well to be fair I never do it one way or another, so I really don't know which might be faster.
AllamHRK
Baronet
forgeofempiresadvice.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-new-guild-raid-system-explained.html
Is this serious? IN SUMMARY.... this guild raids will be a mix of the cultural settlement of Egypt with the guild expedition mechanic?
And this **** is going to replace GxG? Let's see, a resource where you could do hundreds or thousands of fights every day, replaced by one where you can do like 10 FIGHTS? hahahaha
And apparently it won't even be battles against other guilds, but rather against mean bots with high %. And it wouldn't be surprising since the PvP Arena, which theoretically should be Player vs Player, in practice is player vs bots... having said that, we can most likely expect a "GvG" which is actually guild vs bots too...
Well, CBG capped at 500~600 fights per day, Expedition 80 fights per week, GxG destroyed and replaced with garbage where you can do 10 fights per day. Conclusion, in terms of individual ranking... those who are at the top at the end of GxG will stay at the top forever, as there is simply no longer any possibility of fighting more than another player, in the best case scenario everyone can do the same amount of fights .
It's not just going to be the old guild ranking that will freeze in time, the solo ranking too, simply PATHETIC, even for you Inno Games.
Is this serious? IN SUMMARY.... this guild raids will be a mix of the cultural settlement of Egypt with the guild expedition mechanic?
And this **** is going to replace GxG? Let's see, a resource where you could do hundreds or thousands of fights every day, replaced by one where you can do like 10 FIGHTS? hahahaha
And apparently it won't even be battles against other guilds, but rather against mean bots with high %. And it wouldn't be surprising since the PvP Arena, which theoretically should be Player vs Player, in practice is player vs bots... having said that, we can most likely expect a "GvG" which is actually guild vs bots too...
Well, CBG capped at 500~600 fights per day, Expedition 80 fights per week, GxG destroyed and replaced with garbage where you can do 10 fights per day. Conclusion, in terms of individual ranking... those who are at the top at the end of GxG will stay at the top forever, as there is simply no longer any possibility of fighting more than another player, in the best case scenario everyone can do the same amount of fights .
It's not just going to be the old guild ranking that will freeze in time, the solo ranking too, simply PATHETIC, even for you Inno Games.
Marbles
Farmer
Its not a matter of grieving its a matter of wanting to play a war game and having a war aspect to the game. FOE was not a city building game it was a war game and advertised as such, it became a more of a city building game once they didn't migrate GVG to mobile. GE and GBG is not war its you being paired randomly with other teams its more a race to first then a war to first. War is war ... you have enemies and you and your teammates come together to plan attacks and defense its strategic in nature and you as a team get to decide your enemies and how long they remain enemies. It adds a social aspect to the game and that is what keeps players playing so long. There are far better city building games if that is what your looking for but for those of us that were sold on forge being a war game want a war aspect. That aspect doesn't need to be GVG but then guild Raids should be designed to have a war aspect and that means we pick our own enemies and how long they remain enemies and we attack and defend as a guild against such enemies.
Last edited:
Logain Sedai
Baronet
I can't believe that Inno really wants to implement that to replace GVG. How do they expect us to be happy with this feature ? One thing we liked about GVG was that we interacted with other guilds of our choices. Playing against the computer is not interesting and waste the advantages of having such a big community all over the world.
Again, all the information on this page is either made up, posted after official announcements or straight up stolen from other people.
In this case it's the first.
Don't believe everything a random person writes in a random blog.
ShadowPhoenixx95
Squire
Couldn't be more Wrong.
FoE was NEVER advertised as a War game. It was advertised as a Strategy Citybuilding Game that is about evolving your City through the ages of mankind ever since. In Fact. the fighting Aspect doesn't even appear on the Apps discription in the App Store.
ShadowPhoenixx95
Squire
Well, since the posted Blog Site doesn't even get found anymore, I doubt he could
Demeter7
Squire
If FoE was never intended to be a war game, then why does every building they offer in events offer Attack/Defense boosts? Why do they have troops and barracks for the cities? Why do some of the GBs give A/D boosts or troops?
What is the purpose of having all of that, if we only ever battle AI?
Demeter7
Squire
Hah interesting. I wonder why it was taken down? Someone got in big trouble. His whole blog is gone.
I have it saved to a pdf.
Last edited:
ShadowPhoenixx95
Squire
Because Players tended to cry Buildings are Trash when they didn't have Army Bonusses in the Past
Because chosing the fighting Route is a STRATEGY you're able to chose in that STRATEGY Game, as is Negotiating, Guild Supporting, Diamond Farming, Idleing in Age X etc.
What exactly are you Battling in GbG/GvG/GE and even PvP when not pixelated troops controlled by an AI?
Last edited:
ShadowPhoenixx95
Squire
Hah interesting. I wonder why it was taken down?
I have it saved to a pdf.
Hm, maybe because it was speculative BS with less to none confirmed Information, as nobody besides the people developing it know how exactly it's going to look like?