Feedback guild treasury history 1.84

[podkap1970]

this is great !

but, sorry but there is always a but

this needs a filter system
filter by name maybe ?
in my guild we have 361 pages of treasury history in those 7 days
when someone collect his Arc/Obs/Atom, there are 5 entries for each goods

 

[DeletedUser]

when someone collect his Arc/Obs/Atom, there are 5 entries for each goods

really is a waste of space

simply:
"5x Arctic Future goods" under "great building collection"
and everybody knows what he must know

 

[Andi47]

+1 for both, the filter system and the short form ("5x arctic futire goods from GB")

 

[Cardena]

yes, only one entry for all 5 goods from a GB would be much better
And a way of looking for a special player or era of goods would also be good.

 

[DeletedUser7465]

Really a great function for guild leaders (was tired of doing it manually all that time)!
Agree with the tree, filters are needed for better controlling.

 

[Andi47]

Hmmm, filtering should be possible
* by name
* by manual/GB donation
* by Era (including Medals for the all ages map)

 

[DeletedUser]

Every once in a while InnoGames implements indeed something almost sensible

If we could have a filter please?

We need to know by era how much goods are contributed so that we do have an overview how much additional goods are to be contributed for GE and GvG.

The basic idea is great!

 

[DeletedUser7454]

GREAT first step for a feature that was requested for a while. BUT please implement a filter!

As and example one of my guild in live server where we have 72 Obs, 28 Arc and 35 Atoms. This means 135 GB giving goods to treasury x 5 goods = 675 entries daily = 67 page-long log just for GBs
Unlocking 2 levels of GE roughly for 10 ages = 10 eras x 2 levels x 5 goods = 100 entries = 10 more pages
And then the sieges and additional donations = additional few pages.

So the log can be easily 70- 100 page-long just for 1 day! This way it is not really useful

 

[DeletedUser6908]

Filters are definitely needed and GB auto donations could be placed in a separate list since there is less need to access those. About the only reason I can think of is to check to see when someone last collected.

 

[DeletedUser7465]

Any news about filters?

 

[DeletedUser4379]

Too many pages.
Valueless.

 

[DeletedUser7454]

So the log can be easily 70- 100 page-long just for 1 day! This way it is not really useful

I shall stay corrected -- It is at the first day on live server and our log is 450 pages long --- GREAT JOB -- (it was sarcasm just in case that anybody thing it is really great)

 

[DeletedUser4446]

600 pages here, and that's WITHOUT any GvG activity. Another 5 lines added for every siege placed, defensive slot unlocked... not good.

 

[RedRed]

Please group the entries when they comes from a single user action and add filters. Again a feature relased ignoring testers' feedback

 

[Andi47]

600 pages here, and that's WITHOUT any GvG activity. Another 5 lines added for every siege placed, defensive slot unlocked... not good.

Oh, there are siege and deff placing activities logged in the list? I have not even recognized this yet. This list DEFINITELY needs a filtering function!

 

[RedRed]

Also if possible, make the text selectable, so we can copy/paste it somewhere for batch processing