Hiep Lin
Viceroy
In GvG, 3 active players against 20 active players have no chance ..
GvG and GBG are similar on this point.
Only GE is different because the number of members counts for the championships.
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
Feedback Guild Battlegrounds
- Thread starter In.My.ConTroL
- Start date
GvG and GBG are similar on this point.
Only GE is different because the number of members counts for the championships.
LastWarrior
Regent
The ability to see what all guildies have done or not done is a must, its not a possibly please.
Good to see the naming of the sectors is coming in on the next season,I thnk it needs to appear on mouseover but either is good.
When the buildings do appear only guild leaders and above should be able to place them.
Great work, really looking forward to this one.
Good to see the naming of the sectors is coming in on the next season,I thnk it needs to appear on mouseover but either is good.
When the buildings do appear only guild leaders and above should be able to place them.
Great work, really looking forward to this one.
DeletedUser6873
Guest
Its always the same, even when you fight the negotation goods will not change. After reset, its always the same negotation or fight, only the amount of goods you need or the defence and attack boost get a reset.
DeletedUser9523
Guest
The contribution leaderboard for your guild (internally) is on our ToDo-list.
There will be a new guild right called "Battleground Constructor". Only members with this right will be able to start the construction of province buildings, and only they will be able to demolish / cancel buildings.
Bellasaurus
Merchant
I'm in a single person guild, who could have signed me up?
For the initial start all guilds with active members got signed up. The general sign up stuff therefore only applies beyond the first instance (or in case a guild was not signed up then).
Ian Santa Claus
Marquis
my guild has just conquered a sector and it is now locked down, but the other guild that was going for the same sector is shown as having some progress towards it.
I thought that when one guild took a sector all progress by other guilds was wiped out.
I thought that when one guild took a sector all progress by other guilds was wiped out.
Nope, they lose half the progress (rounded up). A flag/progress will only be removed if they lose all adjacency to an owned sector. So let's say you have adjacent sectors A, B, C, and the guild owns A and B and has some progress on C. If sector B gets acquired by another guild, the flag/progress on C would be gone (assuming they don't have any other adjacent sectors to C).
Ian Santa Claus
Marquis
OK, thanks for the clarification
DeletedUser10047
Guest
I would really hope that the progress for players within the guild (similar to GE) will be available soon.
While it may be that some adjustments may need to be made to attrition values, please don't make such changes until the leagues get sorted out in a few seasons. It may be beneficial for attrition to scale up faster (or have a higher max) in diamond league than in copper league.
I appreciate that the Message Center and Guild Chat are both available while in Battlegrounds. It makes communication of goals/strategies much easier.
I like that strategy doesn't revolve around reset. In many cases, there is a lot that can be gained by waiting for a guild to run out of steam before counterattacking. There is a lot of room for effective strategy, while still allowing individual players to add to the guild effort on their own time.
While it may be that some adjustments may need to be made to attrition values, please don't make such changes until the leagues get sorted out in a few seasons. It may be beneficial for attrition to scale up faster (or have a higher max) in diamond league than in copper league.
I appreciate that the Message Center and Guild Chat are both available while in Battlegrounds. It makes communication of goals/strategies much easier.
I like that strategy doesn't revolve around reset. In many cases, there is a lot that can be gained by waiting for a guild to run out of steam before counterattacking. There is a lot of room for effective strategy, while still allowing individual players to add to the guild effort on their own time.
I still do not quite understand the problem here...
In contrast to GE it does not matter if you kick players that do not contribute to the GBG for any member count below 80. The only way to get better in GBG (besides increasing the personal strength of any member) is by adding new members that participate - as long as you do not have 80 members and have other players in line to replace them, kicking guild members will not increase your performance...
This is the main reason why, if such a feature is implemented, I would rather like to see it being possible to get disabled for all/for non guild lead to reduce the possibility of unnecessary strife over "non-participation"
Teak
Steward
I just partly agree with @beelzebob666 here
Indeed, raising the progress cannot be achieved by kicking low performers, BUT:
- setting a daily minimum helps to establish the new feature into the daily routine: this will help the leaders to identify lower potentials ( eg. 2 of 3 future players get 60 progress done - 1 only 40 -> locate issues in the cities and help solving them)
- Monitoring the progress makes it possible to compare yourself to other players with similar progress -> planing the further advance gets another data basis
- goals like “we wanna play in platinum” are kind of hard to focus on and might get frustrating: we want everybody to get 25 | 30 progress done daily is an easier one to communicate and to reach
Indeed, raising the progress cannot be achieved by kicking low performers, BUT:
- setting a daily minimum helps to establish the new feature into the daily routine: this will help the leaders to identify lower potentials ( eg. 2 of 3 future players get 60 progress done - 1 only 40 -> locate issues in the cities and help solving them)
- Monitoring the progress makes it possible to compare yourself to other players with similar progress -> planing the further advance gets another data basis
- goals like “we wanna play in platinum” are kind of hard to focus on and might get frustrating: we want everybody to get 25 | 30 progress done daily is an easier one to communicate and to reach
Last edited:
podkap1970
Emperor
on these 2 colors you still need to work please, rest seems fine so far
DeletedUser10282
Guest
I could not agree more. I was told by a guild founder in one of my worlds that there would be no interest in GBG until this happens.
justMDZ
Farmer
I want to propose improvements (at least in my opinion):
1) Different number of battles for each territory (in order to make even the external territories appealing) - it will also make the strategy more interesting.
2) For the names go back to the first ones and enter the prefix SW-SE-NW-NE (eg SW-Dhiparmi);
you can't have 3 territories in a row that start with Sur Eosh Ai .. on the other side Nor wacht AT ..
Give up a little imagination.
For the colors well the blue, for others there is to work.
Thanks
1) Different number of battles for each territory (in order to make even the external territories appealing) - it will also make the strategy more interesting.
2) For the names go back to the first ones and enter the prefix SW-SE-NW-NE (eg SW-Dhiparmi);
you can't have 3 territories in a row that start with Sur Eosh Ai .. on the other side Nor wacht AT ..
Give up a little imagination.
For the colors well the blue, for others there is to work.
Thanks
I also think that the artificial prefixes are kind of silly - also adding "SW" instead would not really help the case - as the players themselves could just add theses modifiers ad hoc if necessary in chat.
The scheme with the longer names towards the center is interesting though but should be more pregnant - each ring could get an additional syllable instead of an additional letter maybe...
Teak
Steward
Why make it easy, if complicated is another option?
I can’t think of any use, giving provinces names- In GvG you also use the cords.
Just give them the prefix of the Quadrant and a number - A for the inner ring, B for the second an so on, and as numbers use the clock: North would be 1 and keep on counting clockwise
The simpler and more intuitive the feature the less players get frightened of its complexity ( there are many players who never got started with GvG, or quit while trying, because they were highly overwhelmed by finding a sector - and when they did the party was over)
I can’t think of any use, giving provinces names- In GvG you also use the cords.
Just give them the prefix of the Quadrant and a number - A for the inner ring, B for the second an so on, and as numbers use the clock: North would be 1 and keep on counting clockwise
The simpler and more intuitive the feature the less players get frightened of its complexity ( there are many players who never got started with GvG, or quit while trying, because they were highly overwhelmed by finding a sector - and when they did the party was over)
an inhabitant of carcosa
Marquis
Just give them numbers from 1 to x, directly on the map.
Shouldn't be that hard to implement.
Sometimes usability is just more important than immersion.
Shouldn't be that hard to implement.
Sometimes usability is just more important than immersion.