LastWarrior
Regent
Where do you look to see what supplies you got?
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
Feedback Quantum Incursions
- Thread starter Leones
- Start date
Astrid
Baronet
They are blinded by money. That's all they want.
Funny thing how in that announcement they stated that they want to reduce repetitive tasks, increase diversity, interactions between players and then they release quantum settlements
Just look at the state of PvP... it's a complete disgrace, being in the last era is more punishing that ever. In Player Versus Player feature you battle bots lol if you want highest score... and guess what, if you even dare to improve your city defence you get heavily penalized in PvP...
Come on Inno...
Fix what's in the game before even thinking of a new feature.
Pass Go
Squire
top right .. is gives generic "supplies" not a specific item
Kronan
Viceroy
Aside from the fact that I think Inno missed the mark on what people would naturally fall in love with from a new gaming adventure...
I would have lobbied hard for an introduction something like this:
The GOAL of what we can do to help is to HELP. That start with learning enough about it so we can be credible in our feedback.
1) No cost - it's here to TEST - succeed at something, fail at something, but certainly not for us to pay for
2) No cost means winning gets paper rewards - just a folder of what we "would have won".
3) It needs to have a tutorial or make our version a sandbox, so we CAN fail and learn why - with impunity from financial costs.
4) It needs resources here (this forum and/or CMs that know this product) to support us learning it and reacting to feeback.
At this point - it's easy to drop interest because it feels like you guys didn't do your homework for your audience.
US.
I would have lobbied hard for an introduction something like this:
The GOAL of what we can do to help is to HELP. That start with learning enough about it so we can be credible in our feedback.
1) No cost - it's here to TEST - succeed at something, fail at something, but certainly not for us to pay for
2) No cost means winning gets paper rewards - just a folder of what we "would have won".
3) It needs to have a tutorial or make our version a sandbox, so we CAN fail and learn why - with impunity from financial costs.
4) It needs resources here (this forum and/or CMs that know this product) to support us learning it and reacting to feeback.
At this point - it's easy to drop interest because it feels like you guys didn't do your homework for your audience.
US.
Praeceptor
Marquis
10 pages of feedback, all negative, and for obvious reasons. Why doesn't Inno include players in their development meetings? Better to get new features right in the first place than suffer this level of criticism, surely.
Shelby GT500
Merchant
IQ's first problem: The idea!
Second Problem: Implementing the idea!
Third Problem: The player is not stupid, because when he pays he does so because the game is really worth it!
Fourth problem: Whoever had the idea and managed to implement it, trying to sell players a pig in a poke!
Solution? Let Inno decide, but wisely...
Second Problem: Implementing the idea!
Third Problem: The player is not stupid, because when he pays he does so because the game is really worth it!
Fourth problem: Whoever had the idea and managed to implement it, trying to sell players a pig in a poke!
Solution? Let Inno decide, but wisely...
Kronan
Viceroy
They can't (hopefully didn't...) spend the kind of time and money they did on this without customer focus groups of hopefully FoE veteran players. They probably ask players to sign NDA legal waivers to inhibit them from detailing their participation or revealing anything else about what they know.
I wasn't one of those, and those that were - can't talk about it.
But in my mind - this was a HUGE miss.... Just huge. I can't believe someone in product management thinks this is what we would fawn over.
I haven't read 1 single - I love it - comment, and to your point - it's 11 pages of harshly critical or at best - diplomatically neutral - reviews.
It's missing so much of the game I do enjoy - and while it's hard to navigate the rocks of what many would enjoy here, this doesn't seem to be it.
I don't play GvG, but it's now a fully-developed martyr. It died so we can get this?
Last edited:
Shelby GT500
Merchant
And the worst part of all this is that InnoGames has a fantastic game called Grepolis, where solidarity between members of the same "guild" was paramount and in case of suffering attacks or wanting to attack!
Does it cost that much to implement the good things Grepolis has?
Does it cost that much to implement the good things Grepolis has?
forwandert
Farmer
They have previously on other games Inno has, trialled a player council players voted in by all the players that lasted x amount of time for a term and then a new group was voted in. Players from the various markets EN/US etc Working on various ideas, concepts and fixing broken things that could work better.
Halfway through the 2nd term is just disappeared into nothing. Player representatives couldn't get any responses and it just fizzled out.
Kronan
Viceroy
I talk with players all over and I've never heard anyone, anywhere believe that "starting a new game venue (mostly fighting focused), or joint city building venue" on a GbG season timer, with no help (essentially no help) from the MOTHER CITY you spend years building- was even on ANYONE's radar!
12 pages of NO - corroborate that.
12 pages of NO - corroborate that.
Rob Farmer III
Squire
"Attack the Enemy"
What enemy? Where? How?
There is no button or building to click to enter into a battle. A forced tutorial would have been super helpful.
What enemy? Where? How?
There is no button or building to click to enter into a battle. A forced tutorial would have been super helpful.
Tobybeta
Farmer
I agree to all that is already said. And one thing I really can't understand. Yes, we are Beta and here to test new features. BUT, shouldn't we expect that before giving anything online, there will have been tests inside your company? It's not a fair way letting your players pay for testing instead of paying your employees for doing this job.
Ashura Tsunoda
Merchant
I`m not as negative as the rest here. More neutral I guess.
I need more time to play it for a while and progress further to see how I like the balancing. At the start it is a bit frustrating that it takes 10 hours for more supplies..so no building more troops or goods for a while. Might be a bit more balanced later on.
It is too confusing for most without a proper tutorial. I think I understand most now but it is not intuitive and there are many tool tips missing.
I need more time to play it for a while and progress further to see how I like the balancing. At the start it is a bit frustrating that it takes 10 hours for more supplies..so no building more troops or goods for a while. Might be a bit more balanced later on.
It is too confusing for most without a proper tutorial. I think I understand most now but it is not intuitive and there are many tool tips missing.
Sheosun
Farmer
It looks for me like there was a guy or a team who pulled this project till recently. He or they did it in a quite balanced way perfectly knowing how to gain and keep the audience. Then some money-man came in and said: guys, you miss so many opportunities to gain an extra coin! And that is where the end of it usually starts.
Sheosun
Farmer
Come on! "PAY MORE" button works perfectly fine! What else do you need?