Manganite
Merchant
It is an evidence that your data are of no significance to support your assumption.
Of course, it is not an evidence that there is nothing wrong with the ToR. I don't know if it works properly or not, how should I? I have only your data. I just checked, if your data really support your hypothesis. And they do not. Or in other words, they are not significant enough to justify to withdraw the assumption the ToR works like expected.
And I cannot comment on what ever once was wrong with he Arc. I have no experience with the Arc. But it seems, there was once an issue with the Arc and it is now solved. And again, why should they program the ToR like the not properly working version of the Arc and not like the one with no more issues? That doesn't make any sense. I would not assume they start programming the mechanics of each GB from scratch. I would assume they are all based on the same code.
Of course, it is not an evidence that there is nothing wrong with the ToR. I don't know if it works properly or not, how should I? I have only your data. I just checked, if your data really support your hypothesis. And they do not. Or in other words, they are not significant enough to justify to withdraw the assumption the ToR works like expected.
And I cannot comment on what ever once was wrong with he Arc. I have no experience with the Arc. But it seems, there was once an issue with the Arc and it is now solved. And again, why should they program the ToR like the not properly working version of the Arc and not like the one with no more issues? That doesn't make any sense. I would not assume they start programming the mechanics of each GB from scratch. I would assume they are all based on the same code.
Edit: NormaJeane - 2017-09-22 - removed reference(s) to deleted post.
Last edited by a moderator: