Delay will not harm bot-miners, it will lower their income.delay will not harm bot-miners
delay will harm human players
Thanks Captain Obvious. It's just a figure of speech when people say it will 'kill' questing.This doesn't kill questing, it makes it longer, so less rewarding.
This not will lower the income of players who make quests without bots. This will deprive them of their income. Because this delay is annoy. Why would I waste my nerves on THIS? I came here to play games, and unwind from the stresses. I won't look at the gray buttons. I'll have to find another way to have funDelay will not harm bot-miners, it will lower their income.
Delay will not harm human players, it will lower their income.
So, what is your point?
Lowering income, if developers think is necessory, is harming? No, it is not.
I tried it, the delay is about 1s for each aborted quest. So 5 to 10 seconds longer. If your game style is solely based of doing repetable quests all day long, then yes, you will be annoyed, and your income will be lowered in a huge degree. But if you do, for example, one or two repetables per single GB investment, delay barely change your game expirience at all - it is a matter of day or two to get used to it.This will deprive them of their income. Because this delay is annoy. Why would I waste my nerves on THIS? I came here to play games, and unwind from the stresses.
Also, this. Constant clicking on buttons and doing hundreds of identical repetitions is some kind of example of "unwinding the stress"? You should try Microsoft minesweeper thenand unwind from the stresses
Maybe the intension is not to stop the abuse, but exactly to slow it? And if you say it will be slowed by a small fraction - then why is so much hate shown here?This won't stop abuse; it will just slow it by a small fraction. What on earth is the point?
The reason for the hate is that this only affects those of us who sit in front of the computer playing fairly - it won't affect bot players who can wander off and do something else while the bot plays on their behalf.Maybe the intension is not to stop the abuse, but exactly to slow it? And if you say it will be slowed by a small fraction - then why is so much hate shown here?
Once again: the problem is not that it lower my income. The problem is that you do these things automatically. And еhis automat is broken now. You make clicks faster than it need. It's easier to quit quests or find a macros, like all normal people, than to keep doing it with handsI tried it, the delay is about 1s for each aborted quest. So 5 to 10 seconds longer. If your game style is solely based of doing repetable quests all day long, then yes, you will be annoyed, and your income will be lowered in a huge degree. But if you do, for example, one or two repetables per single GB investment, delay barely change your game expirience at all - it is a matter of day or two to get used to it.
So, as I see it, the change is aimed to the players (and bots), who abuse repetables like crazy. In fact, I do it myself in my main city. 140k Arctic era goods per 1.5 months. I will not be overly dissapointed by this change, because i think their intension is to restore some kind of balance.
Don't tell me what to do, and I won't tell you where to go.You should try Microsoft minesweeper then
No, it is not. I still can do it, but surely it will take time to get used to it. Remember the days we make GB investment by 10fp's? Now, let's imagine this "new" pissibility is removed from game. Lot's of people will be complaining and whining. The fact is, people always complain and whine, and degree of complaining doesn't always corresponds with degree of changes.And this automat is broken now.
Using macroses if forbidden, and it can be detected by devs. It's not normal to do this that way. There's a risk of loosing your progress, and most of people surely skip that method.It's easier to quit quests or find a macros, like all normal people, than to keep doing it with hands
What makes you think that? Do you say it can't be detected? My statement is plain and simple. Can be, or can't be.
After the answer on the bug-topic " this is not a bug but intentional" we all started complaining and the only action was closing that topic and saying you can create a new one. More then one week feedback (previous and actual) and all we know is that the mods or devs are huge fans of simon & garfunkel.
♫ this is the sound of silence ♫