Otherwise for those who do not want to see the advertisements, it will suffice not to click on this icon:
Actually, mate, I am a bit curious... for those of us that didn't receive this as part of testing, would it be safe to say that they are testing the ability for those wishing to opt out, those who have active ad blockers, or those who may/may not fiddle with the settings to enable/disable such content (as a simulation, not real practice as I do not know Inno's method to their madness for this)? For if that's the case, then a few more lines of code would not hurt anyone (if placed in right).
You make me think of kids who in front of a plate with unknown foods decided they didn't like having tasted it.
I like this analogy. Reminds me of a time where a kid sees something his mother made and he would not eat it for the world (or would name something in disgust). Even though it was a widely known comic centered around a six year old and his wild imagination, I had seen real life kids doing the same (my nieces would not eat anything if it's not finger foods or lunchables). However, unknown foods can be dangerous, sometimes fatal, if it contained something allergic to a person without it being disclosed before they take the first bite. I am in the latter part of that where I am allergic (now, for some odd reason) to shrimp (even the artificial kind and/or the flavor stuff) that I would convulse, throw up until I pass out, and wake up hours later on a hospital bed. Makes up for a good costume for Halloween as I got the blood (real blood) eyes like I was a demon or possessed by one.
Where does my statement goes with the current situation at hand? Those who are used to having ads would not mind them at all and probably would not care; those who are not used to having ads (or have felt secured after using ad-blockers in making sure they go on the internet ad-free) should not feel that they are betrayed (you have to thank the old "pop-up" ads of yesteryear for the design of such ad-blockers and people's heightened sense of online safety or peace of mind).
This was also why I had said I would rather pay diamonds to use a feature, collect special items, and/or do other things. It's already on most of the things that gave us a choice in doing so, so why not on this type of stuff. I didn't say it should replace the "watch ad" button but it should be a choice on spending diamonds to use or watching an ad to use. Mathematically, if a special feature costs 5 diamonds to use, you will spend the following: 5 for the special quest collection, 5 for each aid all (total of 3 places or 15 diamonds), and 5 for the special incidents (4 from what I had heard so a total of 20 diamonds). A grand total of 40 diamonds in a day to use (unless there's more that come about). In two weeks' time (14 days) that total comes to 560 diamonds spent. If those cost 10 diamonds that amount doubles well over the amount needed to spend $9.99 USD to buy a diamond package of said amount. I didn't factor in the free diamonds obtained by GBg, GE, or quests/regular incidents as I am sure those are low amounts let alone the chance factor of getting such is low.
Take me, for instance, and my desire to spend diamonds to use this. I (for an example I am using as it is not of true disclosure) have 500 diamonds to my name. I decided to aid everyone at the total cost of 15 diamonds for day 1, collect the 4 special incidents (spent 20 in total for them), and collect the special quest (another 5). I now have 460 diamonds left as I didn't get any diamonds today by collection, GE, GBg, WW/FoY, etc. Day 2, I spend another 40 diamonds and I didn't get any from any source, so I now have 420 diamonds left. I did this (and with my luck in not collecting diamonds) for the next couple of days that I wind up with 100 diamonds left (my little threshold, for example). If I want to keep going, I would have to either buy a new diamond package of a sizable amount or would have to "watch an ad" (but in order to do that, I have to disable my ad-blocker or go on the mobile to play such ads so I can do that if I don't want to disable it at the browser). This is what I meant about "choice", not something that is forced upon someone like the unknown food.
Imagine if Inno does this, not only they will see revenue for the ads being watched, but they will see revenue for the diamond packages being bought by those who do not have access to such wealth. Even if they put the price at 10 per, I highly doubt anyone (unless they are the luckiest player on Earth) would collect enough to offset the costs associated with using the special features.
So, basically (and the end of this), three choices:
• Spend diamonds for a feature
• Watch an ad for a feature
• Hide the features from view (those wishing to opt out in settings of the game, regardless of ad-blocking software/extensions)
In the end, everyone is happy.