• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can
    REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
  • Halloween Event 2021


    Read all about the Halloween Event 2021 here!
  • Castle System

    The Castle System is a brand new feature in Forge of Empires which aims to reward players that are playing Forge of Empires actively. Come check it out in your city!
    Do you want to know more about this new feature? Then click here!
  • Cultural Settlement - Mughal Empire

    We are proud to present you our brand new Cultural Settlement: The Mughal Empire!
    This is the fifth of our Cultural Settlements, and your job is to help expand the Mughal Embassy.
    Read all about it here!

Feedback Space Age Asteroid Belt (SAAB)

qaccy

Regent
We have noticed that there is a considerable imbalance between sam and saab in gbg:
-> players in saab can do about 20%! fewer fights per day in Gbg in comparison to sam. That also means 20% less chance on rewards
-> but also a considerable disadvantage for the guild because now more players are needed to conquer a province.
You never expect that the transition to a higher era will cause this much disadvantage.. what will that mean for Venus ...
Think about it like this. How would the units be designed so that you can fight MORE by aging up to SAAB? Comparing SAAB to SAM this way isn't really the proper way to do it, as this isn't the only time where 'aging up is worse'. Truth is, if you care about getting the most out of GBG, you probably shouldn't age up past CE because that's almost certainly the easiest age overall to fight in. Am I wrong on that?
 

DeletedUser3885

Inno must has to end the recurring mission of the battles! As it takes the same has been used in a clearly abusive way by the players! It is not understood why inno ended the history of the champions in GvG and introduced these two recurring missions! It is a shame to see players spending all day on two battle missions and doing more than 4000 a day !!! Inno, put an end to this shame!

Ending this shame is doing justice....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EnamIccug

Farmer
Inno must has to end the recurring mission of the battles! As it takes the same has been used in a clearly abusive way by the players! It is not understood why inno ended the history of the champions in GvG and introduced these two recurring missions! It is a shame to see players spending all day on two battle missions and doing more than 4000 a day !!! Inno, put an end to this shame!

Ending this shame is doing justice....

Inno didn't end the farming of champions in GvG. They just made it so you have to park your alt account in a separate guild and repeatedly siege your main account's guild for your main account to flick.

Even when they have documentation of the two accounts logging in from the same IP address, they won't necessarily act on it.
 

DeletedUser3885

INNO must end this shame of battles in recurring missions! It only leads to abuse!
 

DeletedUser3885

And the shame continues...
There are even players using robots / bots to do thousands of daily battles from recurring missions, but Inno doesn't want to know...
Shame on you...
 

CrashBoom

Emperor
INNO must end this shame of battles in recurring missions! It only leads to abuse!
And the shame continues...
There are even players using robots / bots to do thousands of daily battles from recurring missions, but Inno doesn't want to know...
Shame on you...
what's the difference to GvG battles ?
oh wait: those can be done much faster because not cancelling all the quests between
 

DeletedUser3885

what's the difference to GvG battles ?
oh wait: those can be done much faster because not cancelling all the quests between
Champions at gvg was pushing but now doing thousands of times a day to the same two recurring battle missions, it's normal for Inno ... be wise, Inno who's old enough ...
 

DeletedUser3885

The shame continue all day whit thousands battles in recurring missions...
 

DeletedUser3885

I am so proud
players who do thousands of battles and ten thousand of quest cancels for an useless ranking
you're right, but that doesn't stop them from doing them just because Inno had the brilliant idea (I'm being ironic) to put two recurring missions so they can be done! But, at gvg, the history of the champions, as it was known, is over, because Inno so wished! That was pushing, now is what?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser3885

Not true. Inno wanted to look like they were "fixing" the "problem", but never actually fixed it.
exactly that ... Inno is deceiving us, because it cuts in the gvg to later allow abuses in the recurring missions .........shame
 

Dudettas

InnoGames
This is veering off-topic slightly and began as a comment on the recurring quest. I will pass on your feedback regarding this.
 

DeletedUser3885

We are talking about what is really happening with the big shame of the recurring missions that Inno allows. There are even those who have bots to do these battles thousands of times a day ... it's no off - toppic it's true...only the true that Inno does not want to see, like usualy
 

DeletedUser3885

This is a matter of fairness/justice, as I know many players who have been harmed by the end of the champions farm. If Inno has a sense of justice, it must eliminate these two recurring missions and punish those who use bots to do thousands of battle missions a day.
 

qaccy

Regent
Dude, rankings have been 'exploited' from the very beginning. As in, there's always been something people have done to 'cheat the system' just for the sake of bringing their ranking up. But really, what's the problem here? Ranking doesn't confer any in-game benefit at all. There's isn't really integrity to the rankings anyway; so long as diamonds exist to allow paid advantages, there never will be. And it doesn't matter, because rankings have no direct impact on gameplay.
 

DeletedUser3885

Dude, rankings have been 'exploited' from the very beginning. As in, there's always been something people have done to 'cheat the system' just for the sake of bringing their ranking up. But really, what's the problem here? Ranking doesn't confer any in-game benefit at all. There's isn't really integrity to the rankings anyway; so long as diamonds exist to allow paid advantages, there never will be. And it doesn't matter, because rankings have no direct impact on gameplay.
When you have players who do thousands of times a day (and seven days a week) the battles of the recurring missions, many with the help of bots, while you follow the rules of the game and sometimes make fun of everyone who follows the rules. rules, should you keep quiet?
Inno should never have implemented such missions. There is a huge lack of common sense here, not to mention total responsibility on the part of those who should promote a fair game. If champion farmer battles have been withdrawn, they must be withdrawn as well this missions.
 

qaccy

Regent
When you have players who do thousands of times a day (and seven days a week) the battles of the recurring missions, many with the help of bots, while you follow the rules of the game and sometimes make fun of everyone who follows the rules. rules, should you keep quiet?
Inno should never have implemented such missions. There is a huge lack of common sense here, not to mention total responsibility on the part of those who should promote a fair game. If champion farmer battles have been withdrawn, they must be withdrawn as well this missions.
Again, I don't see what the problem is here. Ranking doesn't matter. So what does it matter if players are repeating these battles? What benefit is being gained here, apart from ranking points which are, as I've pointed out, basically meaningless?