• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can     REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.

Feedback Settlement Updates

Daenerys Targaryen

Baronet
In my opinion, settlements have always needed refinancing because I also agree that it doesn't make sense to keep removing and putting up buildings in the city. It would be easier to just build one building at a time or decrease the amount of missions to produce certain amounts of goods. The settlement was supposed to be easy to play. No one deserves to spend 6 months to 1 year playing to have a complete building. After all, I believe there will be more settlements in the future and if a new player comes and sees how good the buildings are, but sees how long it will take to complete each one he will give up right away or at most he will choose just one settlement to do it, which in the most logical case is the Egyptian one because it is the mix of all the other settlements within a single main building.
 

xivarmy

Legend
Perk Creator
planetofthehumans2 said:
I'm on my last hawaiian settlement. Never did the japan one so that'll probably be next.

But now the yiggy tree is no longer good enough to double collects. :-( Maybe the foe inflation will mean I won't have to do japan either.
Click to expand...
Aztec is the only one that I think is kinda drifting to irrelevantness immediately. A year from now if they keep up the power creep pace, they'll probably all need another round of buffs :p
 

planetofthehumans2

Overlord
xivarmy said:
Aztec is the only one that I think is kinda drifting to irrelevantness immediately. A year from now if they keep up the power creep pace, they'll probably all need another round of buffs :p
Click to expand...
I think it is simply the smallest amount of FP building of the lot and I need another 1M FP to get my ark from 155 to 180. o_O
 

xivarmy

Legend
Perk Creator
planetofthehumans2 said:
I think it is simply the smallest amount of FP building of the lot and I need another 1M FP to get my ark from 155 to 180. o_O
Click to expand...
Oh for that just finish your best building 14 extra times a day for your full 15 doubles lol :)

Ygg is still reasonably efficient for its size, but for doubles you tend to want buildings that are both efficient and BIG.
 

Daenerys Targaryen

Baronet
But you also need to take into account the space, Yggdrasil is 3x3 without roads. It needs to be compared with buildings of the same proportion (9 squares or 10 counting the road for a 3x3).

Edit: But I agree that in a year's time some of the settlement's buildings will be left behind and will have to be updated again. I used to do x2 at Ygg and the temple of the sun, today I don't do it anymore because it's not worth the cost of x2 and having better buildings.
 

planetofthehumans2

Overlord
xivarmy said:
Oh for that just finish your best building 14 extra times a day for your full 15 doubles lol :)

Ygg is still reasonably efficient for its size, but for doubles you tend to want buildings that are both efficient and BIG.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I figure I might as well get the ark "done" before working on expanding the BG. It was great for a while because of the goods content and the new age, so I kind of flipped back and forth between FP and goods. I really dislike the past age goods bonuses though, but the yiggy just aint comparing to the new event buildings with 100+ goods per pull.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top