Rejected selection to whom can add to great buildings

[jasmine12345678910]

Reason

want to level them myself or choose who I would like to give rewards to

Details

click a box to select or unselect

Balance

no changes to anything else , may possibly help lower ranked players

Abuse Prevention

none

Summary

none

Have you looked to see if this has already been suggested?

y

I think there should be the option to select or deselect who and who you dont want adding to your great buildings

 

[jasmine12345678910]

tick box for : neighbourhood only - friends only - guild only - friends/guild nothing hard about it, and no cheats there

 

[jasmine12345678910]

Im disagree

I use my arc90 to get extra fp of my neighboors and friends. You're idea will cut this and allow cheats, because you can allow only one player to get a prize on your gb, and let him to get more than 1000 fp just for 1 fp.

all you have to do is select them then and vice versa simple

 

[Emberguard]

tick box for : neighbourhood only - friends only - guild only - friends/guild nothing hard about it, and no cheats there

Oh that would make it even easier to cheat

 

[jasmine12345678910]

Oh that would make it even easier to cheat

hows that cheating , your not selecting just 1 person , lokks to me like working as a team with just a smaller amount of players if thats what the player wanted

its no different to be able to select just guild only trades

 

[CrashBoom]

tick box for : neighbourhood only - friends only - guild only - friends/guild nothing hard about it, and no cheats there

and everybody from the world

default: all can donate

 

[jasmine12345678910]

and everybody from the world

default: all can donate

only those from selected group

 

[beelzebob666]

wow... 3 pages of discussion for a suggestion that was made dozens of times before and always has been rejected

 

[Darrth Eugene Vader3]

wow... 3 pages of discussion for a suggestion that was made dozens of times before and always has been rejected

Then to the Archive subforum with proper justification. And "New Idea" label to change to "Already Suggested".

 

[Darrth Eugene Vader3]

If the GB Owner wants the rewards of the GB level be distributed between his/her pre-selected players then:

1. Write a message thread with those pre-selected players,
2. Ensure they are online at the same time.
3. Unlock the GB level.
4. Have the selected players do their investment quickly and secure the top five positions. Finish the level.
5. Repeat for next levels as you wish.

There is still a risk that a Neighbor, Friend or Guildmate sees the GB , post an investment, and gets/snipes a rewarding position if he/she acts faster than the pre-selected GB investors. But that risk is reduced if the steps 3rd and 4th are performed quickly. No change is required for this.

A message to the intruder may reduce future not wanted investments, not have to be aggressive, diplomacy still works.

 

[Darrth Eugene Vader3]

the great building in my city is mine so why cant I choose who can and cant add to it

Because you cant limit the rights given by the game to Players to perform social interactions at cities at same neighborhood, friends list, or guild.

• Limit trades to guilds only? That is an exception to the rule, and more and more exceptions would eliminate the game mechanics of social interactions. that would be a major change to the game (DNSL).
• Limit plundering by using shields? Yes, but it comes with a high Tavern Silver cost and also with a Time Limitation.
  • How much to pay for each individual player that you limit to invest at your GBs, for X number of days or a week time limitation?
  • If blocking the whole hood (near 80 players). or the friends (up to 140), or the guid (up to 80) how much to pay for limit them to invest at your GBs, for X number of days or a week time limitation?

These are Balance / Abuse Issues that your idea must resolve.