Forwarded Replace GvG button with a QI button

[Mag.]

Reason

GvG has been discontinued. therefore, the GvG button should be something else.

Details

Whatever the button becomes it would be the same as clicking on that building in your city.
(ex1: if it became a QI button it would be the same as clicking on the building)
(ex2: if it became a GbG but then it would be the same as clicking on the building)etc.

Balance

N/A

Abuse Prevention

N/A

Summary

GvG has been discontinued, therefore the GvG button should be something else.

Have you looked to see if this has already been suggested?

This is a repost of my original idea, because I don't think I put it very clear.

GvG has been discontinued, so there should be something in the button's place. I don't care if it's a quantum intersection, PvP Arena, cultural settlements, Guild Battlegrounds, historical allies, friends Tavern, antique dealer, or even the castle system button.

The QI button will have a nicer simplistic design like the rest of the buttons but this is just give you an idea.

 

[mcbluefire]

The button for QI to replace the GVG button should go STRAIGHT TO THE SETTLEMENT....

 

[Dessire]

+1. Do not want to see anything related to the worst, the most toxic and most terrible feature ever done in FoE!

 

[shad2389]

Beta. Gave up playing the live servers.

But I can say, not much is going on if a 1-man guild as myself would cherry pick some of the sectors in GvG from other guilds.

you can say what ever you want about gvg but it was the only place in game you could truly defend against enemys

 

[Thunderdome]

you can say what ever you want about gvg but it was the only place in game you could truly defend against enemys

Thought I heard "farming" in all of that from long ago, but could be mistaken. And it happens when folks used all rogues for each defensive slot, to which were canon fodder to me.

It never let me deploy where I wanted to go (which was the empty sectors), instead it wanted me to take on whoever has a sector marked for taking.

 

[shad2389]

i think GBG has a lot more farming then gvg had and if they'd bring back gvg they could set it so rogues can't be placed as def like they did for spearfighters

It never let me deploy where I wanted to go (which was the empty sectors), instead it wanted me to take on whoever has a sector marked for taking.

you can prity much say the same thing for gbg locked sectors lol in gvg i could place sieges almost on hole cost and take #1 rank for map i think you wanted to land somewhere else when your guild already had sectors on map which is why ghost guilds were useful and you most probably didn't understand how gvg worked

 

[planetofthehumans2]

We're 3 weeks out on this idea and +8, mods?

 

[shad2389]

We're 3 weeks out on this idea and +8, mods?

7

 

[shad2389]

i still think they'll crate a new gvg and with fact QI is based on manual fighting i think new gvg will need more manual fighting then auto fighting like QI , QI might be like this to accustome us to manual fighting for new gvg

 

[Mag.]

i still think they'll crate a new gvg and with fact QI is based on manual fighting i think new gvg will need more manual fighting then auto fighting like QI , QI might be like this to accustome us to manual fighting for new gvg

If they do I'll still be satisfied

 

[planetofthehumans2]

i still think they'll crate a new gvg and with fact QI is based on manual fighting i think new gvg will need more manual fighting then auto fighting like QI , QI might be like this to accustome us to manual fighting for new gvg

Only if you get like 50 auto battles for 1 manual. Honestly we're beyond the stage of manual fighting anymore, you'll get arthritis doing all these repetitive clicks, 8000 battles in 2 weeks, each battle is at least 5 clicks. We need a way of doing mass battles.

 

[Mor-Rioghain]

Anything but GvG.

So you liked it. It is gone. Get over it. Less than 5% of the total player base played GvG. Bringing GvG or something similar back for just a few would be very stupid bussiness management.

Wise up. There are spoilers on almost anything except GvG. Shouldn't that tell you something?

Inno has admitted that all players (mobile & browser) were asked this question and it is from those answers that they came up with the 5%. I know it may seem like a stretch but I think you'd be surprised at how many mobile only players aren't even aware that they couldn't play GvG much less whether they would want to or not.