• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can
    REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.

Do Not Suggest New life for 'old GB' or the possibility to store them

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reason
most of us have 'old GB' at very hight level (80, 100 or more) and, if we compare them to new 'special buildings', they have very very low statistics... its a waste to destroy them couse we spent lot of level on them.. but its a waste of space to keep them
Details
i propose to give them a 'new life' updating theyr statistics or give the possibility to store them.
Balance
it will be same condition for every member of every level, so its balanced.. to update statistics we can think about spending good of GB's age to allow the update and keep it more balanced
Abuse Prevention
no abuse
Summary
i think this idea should be good, thinking that space in city is not limitless, so best strategy is use the space we have in best way possible
Have you looked to see if this has already been suggested?
nothing similar
We can think to make statisctics update from 80's level.. from the 80s, each level should costs pf + goods of GB era, in this way new statistics are balanced... users who already have hight level GB should spend the ammout of goods to make the new statistics works..

for GBs who i think its urgently needed a update there are:
Statue of Zeus
Tower of Babel
Colosseum
Lighthouse of Alexandria
Cathedral of Aachen
Hagia Sophia
St. Mark's Basilica
Norte Dame
Saint Basil's Cathedral
Castel del Monte
Deal Castle
Frauenkirche of Dresden
Royal Albert Hall
Alcatraz
Space Needle
Atomium
Cape Canaveral
The Habitat
Innovation Tower
Lotus Temple
Voyager V1
Truce Tower
Rain Forest Projec
Gaea Statue
 
Last edited:
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top