• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can
    REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.

Feedback New Era of Great Buildings: Explore Prestige Tiers

Forge of Empires loses money every month from its games, and they want to implement an even stricter monetization system.
 
Forge of Empires loses money every month from its games, and they want to implement an even stricter monetization system.
They just need to change their policy. When you see the prices of buildings in the stores, it's unappealing. They're not business-minded at all; even their limited-time offers are ridiculous. They should ask real players who actually play their games, and they'd make much more profit.
 
Forge of Empires Innogames GmbH loses money every month from its their games, and they want to implement an even stricter monetization system.
Don't you want leave feedback on discord because discord is very active and exist youtube, facebook, reddit, instagram and more where you can leave your feedback
 
They just need to change their policy. When you see the prices of buildings in the stores, it's unappealing. They're not business-minded at all; even their limited-time offers are ridiculous. They should ask real players who actually play their games, and they'd make much more profit.
What $100 for a building you might keep in your city for a year isn't worth it? ;)
 
And the goods requirement.
And even the coins and supplies requirements. :confused:
True. All the things set in the new system for unlocking and getting the silver and gold BPs are ridiculous.

Adding this for both celebration of my first L200+ GB which is completely worthless in live AND for posterity so folks can see what it was like prior to the GB nerf, er upgrade, being released to live in whatever state Inno decides to go with.

1779724846730.png
1779724901238.png
Ownershare at 2.0
194: 105,528
195: 108,484
196: 111,516
197: 114,626
198: 117,806
199:121,079
200: 124,436
201: 127,879
Total 0 to 201 is 4,312,633 FP
 

Attachments

  • 1779724805991.png
    1779724805991.png
    487.8 KB · Views: 12
why am i not surprised by this kind of answer eaven if it does'nt answer my questions and conserns ?

what else could you even hope for? support team has no say in what is or isn't happening and can only forward your message on as feedback. the reply to you *has* to be empty because they have no extra information or decision making authority to give you a satisfying response.
 
Dear Inno!

Please purge this ugly update from beta!
If you are not able to roll it back, please give us a clear step-by-step roadmap how are you going to get rid of it.

Stop fiddling with your historic allies and other insignificant trivia nobody asked for while this venomous rusty nail keeps poisoning the game.
 
Dear Inno!

Please purge this ugly update from beta!
If you are not able to roll it back, please give us a clear step-by-step roadmap how are you going to get rid of it.

Stop fiddling with your historic allies and other insignificant trivia nobody asked for while this venomous rusty nail keeps poisoning the game.
I feel like if they were able to get rid of it, they would have done so by now. You should post this on the discord though, nobody from inno actually reads the forums anymore.
 
They can and there are multiple ways to go about it. The only thing they need to be careful about is ensuring people who bought things since the update get appropriately compensated. Horrible idea to actually permit sales on a beta platform.
 
They can and there are multiple ways to go about it. The only thing they need to be careful about is ensuring people who bought things since the update get appropriately compensated. Horrible idea to actually permit sales on a beta platform.
Unfortunately permitting payments on testing environments is a necessary evil.
Payment methods need testing too and the entire payment chain need constant QA or it breaks. And when it breaks revenues goes to 0 until it's fixed!

It's still a nightmare when you need to refund developers or testers using personal cards.
You don't want to give dev/qa access to a company card, not when there is a risk that someone will write an automated test with real money (even if we ignore the risk of card details theft since automated testing tools are not PCI compliant usually).
 
Back
Top