Do Not Suggest guildbattleground Tavern Shop

[DeletedUser10082]

Proposal: Extra turn in tavern shop for guildbattleground negotiation same as guild expedition negotiation

 

[CrashBoom]

great idea
like in GE we should need up to 10 different things to offer

 

[Nessie]

great idea +1

Another great idea posted somewhere is "Negotiations only with goods from the actual era" and not your actual era and the one before.
Example: if you are in future era, negotiations should be with future goods only and not future and tomorrow goods

 

[LastWarrior]

not going to happen but worth a try +1

 

[CrashBoom]

not going to happen

not without balancing the goods cost

if negotiation would be easier (and a free 4th definitely makes it easier) then the amount of goods needs to be higher

InnoGames want you to spend x amount of goods on average
and not half of them because you have 4 tries

 

[LastWarrior]

the diamond use would be drastically dropped so its no chance

 

[Hiep Lin]

Proposal: Extra turn in tavern shop for guildbattleground negotiation same as guild expedition negotiation

And a negotiation gives only one point same as guild expedition negotiation
And a negotiation must have 10 choices same as guild expedition negotiation

 

[Dudettas]

The intention was not to upset anyone, I apologize.
We were still debating the matter internally, as attrition and difficulty has still been in flux.

We will continue to keep an eye on attrition & difficulty, however at this point in time it seems unlikely to add a 4th round for negotiations.
The reason is that negotiations provide two advances (with a slightly increased chance to obtain a reward), and this is because it considers all other factors:

• Negotiations will always cost you precious goods, whereas battles may end up without any losses
• Negotiations always take quite some time (as opposed to auto-battles), which will be especially significant for high leagues, where provinces get focussed to be taken within minutes
• Experienced players have a good grasp on when a battle will be won (beforehand), whereas current negotiation setups sometimes fail

Also keep in mind that Guild Expededition negotiations may demand more than 6 options (as opposed to Battlegrounds), which makes the 4th round option quite necessary there.

This is something that has been considered but unlikely to happen, I will move to do not suggest. Thank you for your suggestion.

 

[DeletedUser]

Despite this being in the DNSL section I like the idea .