the funny thing is that I'm just trying to make everybody see that events are unfair for players who love futuristic designs, only one part of the players are happy, why no both?
I see your intend, but the way you do it is not very nice and will never lead to a factual discussion.
If I take your point, than events are unfair for players, that don't like quests, this game is also unfair for people who don't like battles, who don't like long term strategy games, who don't like turn based battles, who don't like master mind (negotiations), ...
You can't make everybody happy. And they way it currently is, more people are happy with it, because more players are in lower eras.
do you have something against that?
Until now I did not say anything about my personal opinion, but since you ask: I don't have something against futuristic event buildings. I just evaluate the pros and cons. Since you already wrote the pros, I wanted to post the cons.
or are you so unhappy with your life that the only thing you have to do is post useless and unworthy things?
Are you talking about yourself? Sorry, but this has nothing to do in a discussion. If you don't like other peoples opinion, then a forum is definitely the wrong place for you.
pff also, if we follow your stupid logic, then tell all players who are not in future age that they must delete their arcs because according to you, futuristic things doesn't fit with old things. . . so stupid your logic. .
Thanks for calling my logic stupid. Is everything you don't agree with stupid?
I already explained, that it is unrealistic and i don't want more unrealistic things in the game.
Also I would have preferred, that it would be, that you can only build a arc if you reach future era. But This change can not be done anymore sadly.