Carillion seems worthless ??? Is this an oversight?

[DeletedUser3764]

Does this make sense:
Carillon gives 236 happiness on 2x1 squares? ALSO it produces 260 Player points or 130 Player points per square.
Ornamental tree gives 105 happiness on a 1x 1 square also produces 220 Player points per square.
The tree costs 120 diamonds, the Carillion costs 150.
Why would a diamond player swap out the Carillion for the tree? The difference in happiness between 2 trees and 1 Carillion is only 26 not really important since most diamond players have plenty extra happiness. Why would a diamond player spend another 150 diamonds to replace the tree with the Carillion only to go backwards 180 player points EACH?
That is a loss of 1,800 player points for each 10 trees replaced with 5 carillons....
Same thing applies to the new fountain with benches...
Would it not make sense to give these new premium tools a slightly higher player point’s value so that there is some incentive to buy them?
AS OPOSED TO NERFING THE TREES THAT WERE ALREADY PAID FOR WITH HARD EARNED CASH PLEASE....

 

[DeletedUser]

hmm it seems they want to lower the points of all InA players
one Gambrelroof-House = 203 points
one Victorian House = 225 points
But Victorian is 1.5 times bigger than a Gambrel -> it should be about 300 points. so for every Victorian House u loose about 75 points

 

[aliatela]

hmm it seems they want to lower the points of all InA players
one Gambrelroof-House = 203 points
one Victorian House = 225 points
But Victorian is 1.5 times bigger than a Gambrel -> it should be about 300 points. so for every Victorian House u loose about 75 points

And that's true for most InA buildings (especially houses). Though, I can't understand reason behind this.