• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can     REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.

Rejected Button: Replace Units. Troops from Buildings by Default.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Arkantos

Farmer
Reason
Currently, the "replace units" button prioritizes using available troops first. However, at lower levels, barracks troops are often used first as they can be replenished. As a result, at lower levels, the button loses its practical value.
Details
When pressing the "replace units" button, troops from the barracks should be prioritized.
Balance
This change will not affect game balance.
Abuse Prevention
no
Summary
.
Have you looked to see if this has already been suggested?
yes
A new "replace units" button has been introduced. However, it prioritizes available units rather than units from the barracks. This isn't critical for higher levels, but at the early stages of the game, barracks troops are often used first as they can be replenished, unlike available troops. I propose that troops from the barracks should be prioritized first.
 
Upvote 3 Downvote
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
Thunderdome

Thunderdome

Emperor
It really doesn't matter. The new player would have to build a lot of barracks to make use of the feature in having a good amount of troops available. This could take hours if they lose a lot.

I am neither for or against this idea.
 
Sl8yer

Sl8yer

Emperor
No.

To start with, it does not prioritize available units, but unattached units. Changing that to attached units will put the problem with those that want to use unattached units only. If you want a change you should ask it to follow the settings you already have in your army management. Since the replace units button is a new feature, you can suggest any changes to it in the feedback thread, It does not need to be voted on.
 

Arkantos

Farmer
Sl8yer said:
To start with, it does not prioritize available units, but unattached units. Changing that to attached units will put the problem with those that want to use unattached units only. If you want a change you should ask it to follow the settings you already have in your army management. Since the replace units button is a new feature, you can suggest any changes to it in the feedback thread, It does not need to be voted on.
Click to expand...
And where is this thread? Please provide a link.
 
The Lady Redneck

The Lady Redneck

Marquis
Arkantos said:
And where is this thread? Please provide a link.
Click to expand...
They did not make a feedback thread for this feature in the Forum as they are not interested in Forum Feedback. They directed people to give any feedback on this topic to their discord channel. So I am not sure that posting a new idea here would be looked at.

I can see this idea having some merit for low age players who have not taken the time in each age to maximize their cities potential before moving to the next age and still needing to actually build rax plus the housing required to support them. But once you reach PE or above you should be producing enough unattached troops not to need to build rax or need housing. And just have the base of the building for the main unit you will use plus the base of a Rogues Den. (providing you have Traz) With any other troops coming from event buildings. GBG and GE. As very few players choose to stay in these lower ages Most players in the game are in higher Eras. So it would only have a limited short term advantage at best.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top