Rejected archeology event

[lord budovatel cz]

Reason

archeology event

Details

archeology event with old mechanic

Balance

???

Abuse Prevention

???

Summary

???

Have you looked to see if this has already been suggested?

NO because I dont know

Visual Aids

?

my idea is new argeology event with old mechanics

 

[The Lady Redneck]

So you want the old event?

 

[lord budovatel cz]

i played it once

 

[ADSL]

We all want this old event.

 

[planetofthehumans2]

Alright mods, package this one off to the devs, no notes needed.

 

[lord budovatel cz]

this event has good soundtrack (wildlife soundtrack is good too)

 

[Thunderdome]

You know this is wanted

 

[The Lady Redneck]

this event has good soundtrack (wildlife soundtrack is good too)

I never have soundtracks, animation or sounds on. I stopped using them years ago to cut down on lag and other problems.

 

[Mag.]

If you really want this implemented you should probably add a lot more detail. Because I have no clue what you are talking about.

 

[lord budovatel cz]

Because I have no clue what you are talking about.

about archeology event

 

[Mag.]

about archeology event

I know you're talking about that but I don't know what that is, what I mean is that you should elaborate on your idea, make it more detailed and complex so I know exactly what you're talking about to the dot.

 

[lord budovatel cz]

my idea is archeology event in this year

 

[Mor-Rioghain]

I know you're talking about that but I don't know what that is, what I mean is that you should elaborate on your idea, make it more detailed and complex so I know exactly what you're talking about to the dot.

Why? The suggestion was rejected. This is a dead thread.

It just seems that the OP liked the event and wanted it returned. The developer has stated that it won't come back, hence the rejection (I presume). That's just "dead-er," not just "dead."

(Not being rude, just pointing it out)

 

[Mag.]

Why? The suggestion was rejected. This is a dead thread.

It just seems that the OP liked the event and wanted it returned. The developer has stated that it won't come back, hence the rejection (I presume). That's just "dead-er," not just "dead."

(Not being rude, just pointing it out)

there's nothing against resuggesting in a different format(or way) with more detail.

 

[drakenridder]

I know you're talking about that but I don't know what that is, what I mean is that you should elaborate on your idea, make it more detailed and complex so I know exactly what you're talking about to the dot.

It's quite easy to find on the internet. Mechanics are super simple but last time we've seen it was Halloween 2022

 

[Mor-Rioghain]

there's nothing against resuggesting in a different format(or way) with more detail.

Actually, there is something wrong with it. If you are truly behind resubmitting an idea with your own details, why not start a new suggestion? There's a reason that the thread has a big red "REJECTED" listed on the banner.

 

[Mag.]

Actually, there is something wrong with it. If you are truly behind resubmitting an idea with your own details, why not start a new suggestion? There's a reason that the thread has a big red "REJECTED" listed on the banner.

That is true but people might like it if there's more detail and if it's just differently, it's kind of like an advertisement. Would you want to buy a hat that's advertised that just tells you words, saying "this is a hat and you should buy it." or "this is a hat and you should buy it because reason A ,reason B ,and reason C." Which one do you like better? I think I'd rather buy the hat from Scenario B because I have some good reasons. This is why the post failed it failed because it would fall into the category of scenario A.

 

[lord budovatel cz]

archeology event with old mechanics, soundtrack new building, improvements to old buildings from archeology event simply put, the revival of the archeology event

 

[Mor-Rioghain]

That is true but people might like it if there's more detail and if it's just differently, it's kind of like an advertisement. Would you want to buy a hat that's advertised that just tells you words, saying "this is a hat and you should buy it." or "this is a hat and you should buy it because reason A ,reason B ,and reason C." Which one do you like better? I think I'd rather buy the hat from Scenario B because I have some good reasons. This is why the post failed it failed because it would fall into the category of scenario A.

So you know that the reason that the idea was rejected had to do with lack of choices? Impressive! I guess it has nothing at all to do with it falling into the DNS category, huh? smh

 

[Markus Stormrider]

the old event was okay-ish. i'd like to see something new interactive being introduced (perhaps something more interactive too)