Why do you implement the galata like this on live-servers? This is beta to test things and solve bugs. If there occurs a bug here, they should wait to do it on live servers till the bug is fixed.
I'd second this. My main concern was the change doesn't match the announcements logic and reasoningI'd even be fine with keeping it as it is so long as the announcement is amended to say that it's intended for it to be more expensive to level than other GBs.
No, you and everyone else who already leveled it is probably fine with it. I however am not fine with it. Give me one good reason why this should be the only great building with rewards from one group and costs from another, picked to make it as expensive as possible? That just feels like a big middle finger to anyone who haven't built it yet.Or, and I'll probably be the only one to suggest this, I'd even be fine with keeping it as it is so long as the announcement is amended to say that it's intended for it to be more expensive to level than other GBs.
I'm fine with any change that explained clearly. If Inno's intent is for it to be more expensive than other GBs to level, I'm ok with that as long as they say so. I'm not ok with any change where their stated intention doesn't match up with what they actually change. And that's what's currently happening here.No, you and everyone else who already leveled it is probably fine with it. I however am not fine with it. Give me one good reason why this should be the only great building with rewards from one group and costs from another, picked to make it as expensive as possible? That just feels like a big middle finger to anyone who haven't built it yet.
Do you honestly believe people start reading posts randomly in the middle? I however asked you for one good reason why this GB should be different from all other GBs. If they want to make it more expensive they can make it hma which is more expensive than ema. An announcement changes nothing about how good or bad the new gt is. It can only change our view about how good or bad innogames are.Did you happen to read the whole thing?
So, right now the galata has the costs for a now age building and the rewards for an EMA building.
Is this going to change? I think the goal was to make this GB cheaper to level, but they made it more expensive... I thought they'd change this 'bug' within a few days, but now we're more than 2 weeks later and still nothing has changed. Is this ever going to happen or will they leave it like this?
If that's the case, it would be nice if they'd say/said that, instead of putting out conflicting information then going stone silent on the issue when it is raised over and over.The main goal is they wanted to make it a normal GB with blueprints from normal sources (aiding/random blueprints) rather than the questline.
They could've made it HMA and kept all the costs past level 10 the same (no age buildings match HMA buildings in cost & reward past 10). But they decided on HMA costs with EMA rewards for whatever reason - and used the justification that it'd have been too rewarding if the rewards weren't cut - but that only applies if they'd also cut the total FP cost.
If that's the case, it would be nice if they'd say/said that, instead of putting out conflicting information then going stone silent on the issue when it is raised over and over.
Is it possible to give us some information @Iordwasa ? Maybe you have to ask it to the game developers first, but it would be nice if we knew that you're busy with it. I've asked this more than 2 weeks ago, but apart from the likes (thanks for them!) there was no reaction on this...@lordwasa Would it be possible to have an official statement on whether or not this problem is an actual one and will be addressed ? Or if it was meant to be this way ? Thanks in advance
I regret missing this post when it was more current, as I don't like this response. Not when the announcement for the change clearly states one of the goals as preventing the Galata Tower from 'behaving adversely from other Great Buildings'. As of the change, the GT does exactly that. It's an Early Middle Ages GB with the costs of a High Middle Ages GB. If that's not behaving adversely from other GBs, then I don't know what is. If this is intended, then that makes the announcement pretty misleading.|It's intended behavior and won't be changed